As a counterpoint to @Steven counterexample, let's prove that if $w$ nonconstant, has no mixed terms so it is $c+\sum_{k=1}^na_kz_1^k+\sum_{k=1}^mb_kz_2^k$ and if ether $m \ne n$ or if $m =n \ne 0$ and $|a_n| \ne |b_n|$ then $T(z, \bar z)=w(z, \bar z)$ is surjective so $T(\mathbb C)=\mathbb C$
By using $T-a$ which is of the same form, it is enough to prove that $T$ has at least one zero, and actually, we will prove that it has at least $n$ isolated zeroes.
With a bit more care by analyzing the Sylvester resultant of $T(z, \bar z)=\sum p_k(z)\bar z^k, \overline {T(z, \bar z)}=\sum q_k(z)\bar z^k$ when regarded as polynomials in $\bar z$ with coefficients in $\mathbb C[[z]]$ which vanishes precisely when $T$ vanishes, one can easily show that if $m <n$ all the roots of $T$ are among (but not necesarily all) the roots of a regular (analytic) polynomial in $z$ of degree precisely $n^2$ and hence they are isolated and at most $n^2$, while looking at $T_1(z, \bar z)=\frac{\bar a_n T-b_n \bar T}{|a_n|^2-|b_n|^2}$ which is easily seen to have same roots as $T$ and is in the case $m<n$ shows the result (at most $n^2$ isolated zeroes) for $n=m, |a_n| \ne |b_n|$ too.
Wlog we can assume either $n >m$ or $n=m, |a_n|>|b_n|$ so (letting $b_k=0, n < k \le m$ in the first case) consider the quantity:
$$R=\max (1, \frac{|c|+\sum_{k=1}^n(|a_k|+|b_k|)}{|a_n|-|b_n|})$$
Consider $g(re^{i\theta})=b_ne^{-in\theta}+a_ne^{in\theta}$ and note that $|g(re^{i\theta})| \ge (|a_n|-|b_n|)r^n>0$. But if $r>R \ge 1$ we have that
$|g(re^{i\theta})-T(re^{i\theta})| \le |c|+\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(|a_k|+|b_k|)r^k \le (|c|+\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}(|a_k|+|b_k|)r^{n-1}$
hence by our choice of $R$ and the fact that $r >R$ we get
$$|g(re^{i\theta})-T(re^{i\theta})|<(|a_n|-|b_n|)r^n \le |g(e^{i\theta)})$$
So $T$ doesn't vanish on $C_r$, the positively oriented circle of radius $r$, and with $d$ denoting the topological degree, we have that $d(T, C_r)=d(g,C_r)=d(h, C_r)=d(h, C_1)$ where $h(z)=a_nz^n-b_n\bar z^n$ (and using the obvious fact that $h$ doesn't vanish on the annulus $1<|z|<r$ so $d(h, C_1)=d(h, C_r)$)
But now on $C_1$ we have that $h(z)=a_nz^n(1-b_n\bar z^{2n}/a_n)$ and $\Re (1-b_n\bar z^{2n}/a_n)>0$ which means that $d(1-b_n\bar z^{2n}/a_n, C_1)=0$,
hence $d(h, C_1)=d(a_nz^n, C_1)+d(1-b_n\bar z^{2n}/a_n, C_1)=n$ so $d(T, C_r)=n$ which means that $T$ has at least $n$ isolated zeroes with positive multiplicity inside $C_r$ since the sum of the multiplicities of the isolated zeroes adds to $n$ by the definition of the topological degree, so we are done and have shown that $T$ is surjective in this case.