I'm looking for an elementary proof of the fact that $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{2^n}{n}=0$$ in the field $\mathbb{Q}_2$ of $2$-adic numbers. I know that this follows from the functional equation of the $p$-adic logarithm $0=\log(1)=\log((-1)^2)=2\log(-1)$, but I like to see a more straight-forward argument.
-
I'm not sure if this is technically more straightforward or not, $$\log(-1)=\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{(-1)^{2^n}-1}{2^n} = 0$$ – Merosity Oct 02 '22 at 04:16
-
@Merosity where does this formula come from? – Brauer Suzuki Oct 02 '22 at 04:34
-
1Almost duplicate: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/1990667/96384 – Torsten Schoeneberg Oct 03 '22 at 01:26
-
1@TorstenSchoeneberg Thanks! This also points to another site with a longer answer by Peter Scholze from 2004! – Brauer Suzuki Oct 03 '22 at 05:07
-
New duplicate: https://math.stackexchange.com/q/4852786/96384 – Torsten Schoeneberg Feb 07 '24 at 15:44
1 Answers
Expanding @Merosity's idea, here is a solution: Let $N$ be a positive integer. Then
\begin{align*} 0 = \frac{1 - (1 - 2)^{2^N}}{2^N} &= \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{2^N} \binom{2^N}{k} (-1)^{k-1} 2^k \\ &= \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \left[ \prod_{l=1}^{k-1} \left( 1 - \frac{2^N}{l} \right) \right] \frac{2^k}{k}. \end{align*}
In the second step, we utilized the binomial theorem.
In the third step, we utilized the identity $\frac{1}{n}\binom{n}{k} = \frac{1}{k} \binom{n-1}{k-1} $
By the dominated convergence theorem, as $N \to \infty$ this converges to
$$ 0 = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \left[ \lim_{N\to\infty} \prod_{l=1}^{k-1} \left( 1 - \frac{2^N}{l} \right) \right] \frac{2^k}{k} = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \frac{2^k}{k} $$
and therefore the desired conclusion follows.

- 167,468
-
Thank you for this nice argument! After the 2nd equality the factor $\frac{1}{2^N}$ seems to be missing. Before I accept, I wait until tomorrow if someone comes up with an even easier argument. – Brauer Suzuki Oct 02 '22 at 06:15
-
@BrauerSuzuki, Glad it helped, and thank you for pointing out my typos. I fixed it. I would also love to see more "direct" argument. :) – Sangchul Lee Oct 02 '22 at 06:32