Sequences:
I like to see a sequence $(u_n) \in \mathbb K ^{\mathbb N}$ as: $$(u_n) = \sum_0^{\infty} u_i\times (e_i)$$
where $u_i$ is $i$-ish term of the sequence and $(e_i)$ are the sequences such as $$(e_0)=(1, 0, 0, ...)$$
$$(e_1)= (0,1,0, ...)$$
Functions:
In complete analogy, I'd like do the same with a function $f\in \mathbb K ^{\mathbb R}$
$$f = \int_{\mathbb R} f(x) e_x$$
where $e_x$ :
$$ \left. \begin{array}{l} \text{if $t=x$ }&1\\ \text{if $t\neq x$}&0 \end{array} \right\} =e_x (t) $$
and $f(x)$ is the value of $f$ at $x$
My question is: is it valid to use the integral sign in this definition? I am used to see this integral symbol with the $dx$ symbol. That's why I ask.