2

Let $F(x,y) = M(x,y)i + N(x,y)j$ be a vector field on the real plane.


Suppose that Div F = $\frac{\partial M}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial N}{\partial y} = 0$

It follows that there exists a function $g: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ (oft called a stream function) such that:

$M = \frac{\partial g}{\partial y}$ and $N = \frac{-\partial g}{\partial x}$

Now, suppose also that Curl F = $\frac{\partial M}{\partial y} - \frac{\partial N}{\partial x} = 0$

It follows that there exists a function $f: \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ (oft called a potential function) such that:

$M = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}$ and $N = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}$


Thus, if $F(x,y) = M(x,y)i + N(x,y)j$ has vanishing curl and divergence, we can see that:

$M = \frac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial g}{\partial y}$

$N = \frac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\frac{-\partial g}{\partial x}$

That is it to say, the components of $F$ are equal to the Cauchy-Riemann Equations.


This is amazing to me. I really would like to understand what's going on more. I understand that vector fields with vanishing curl and divergence are very important in mathematics. Why should we expect that such vector fields have such a direct connection with complex functions? I have a hard time knowing the exact question I want to ask because I don't know what I don't know.

I also recommend Ian's answer in this post: Is there any intuition or meaning regarding Cauchy-Riemann equations?

Where he explains the Cauchy-Riemann equations as the condition for the derivative of a complex function to act as multiplication of a complex number (and thus a linearization of the complex function).

  • there is a theorem that shows that, in some cases (that are very general) a closed differential form is also exact, so it have a primitive. This is what happens here, where the differential forms are seeing as vector fields. In short: the Cauchy-Riemann equations are just the notion of closeness of the corresponding differential form – Masacroso Sep 14 '22 at 13:02
  • Saff has a really nice section on the connection between vector calculus and complex analysis. – Cameron Williams Sep 14 '22 at 13:17
  • The book by Saff and Snider (Fundamentals of complex analysis) is downloadable here (a made-in-a-hurry copy...) – Jean Marie Sep 14 '22 at 13:58

1 Answers1

1

First of all, let us note that $\mathbb{R}^2 \cong \mathbb{C}$. Let us set $z=x+iy$ and $\bar{z}=x-iy$ Furthermore, let us use the language of differential forms.
We can identify a vector field $F:\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ with a 1-form $A$ $$ F \mapsto A=A_z dz+A_{\bar{z}}d\bar{z} $$ Vanishing curl is equal to $$ dA=(\partial_{\bar{z}}A_z-\partial_zA_{\bar{z}})d\bar{z} \wedge dz=0 $$ This implies that there exists some $\phi:\mathbb{C} \to \mathbb{C}$ such that $$ d\phi=\partial_{z}\phi dz+\partial_{\bar{z}}d\bar{z}=A. $$ This property is non-trivial and relies on the fact that $\mathbb{C}$ is simply connected. It is the equivalent to every holomorphic function having a primitive, which you might know from your complex analysis class.
Vanishing divergence is expressed via the Hodge dual as
$$ \star dA=0. $$ This implies that $$ (\star d)d \phi=0 $$ Now, if you dont understand the Hodge dual yet, that is fine - that was some heavy machinery I have used. You can show that this is equal to $$ \Delta \phi=0. $$ That implies that the Laplacian of the real and imaginary part vanish. Again, since you are working on a simply connected domain, that means that the real and imaginary part of $\phi$ are the real and imaginary of some holomorphic function. And therefore, they satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations.

In more fancy terms: On a map beween simply connected domains of $\mathbb{C}$, every harmonic maps is holomorphic.
And in the fanciest terms: Furthermore, every such vector field such as $A$ can be decomposed into a divergence free, curl free and harmonic field. This is what you call Hodge decomposition, and it has been worked out pretty extensively for Riemannian surfaces (for which $\mathbb{C}$ is an example).

F. Conrad
  • 4,335
  • 1
  • 12
  • 21