Suppose we define a structure $\mathbb{C}[X]$ such that all elements are polynomials $$p_{n}(X)=\sum_{1\le i\le n}C_i X^i$$ where $C_i$ and $X$ are, respectively, coefficient matrices and an unknown matrix $X$ [we are positing that these are square $m$ by $m$ matrices across the board].
My question is almost a pointless question, but humor me: Do we arrive at the same results as in the case of regular polynomials when we perform algebraic reasoning on these objects using Galois theory? Does Galois theory still hold up for being applied to these matrix polynomials?
More specifically: My intuition tells me that there exists a matrix formula for each regular formula relative to degrees 1, 2, 3, and 4, but not 5 or higher (the Abel-Ruffini theorem). It seems to me that this should be a natural result: matrices operate just like scalars in terms of polynomial equations. However, the generality of it is what has me worried because it takes only one circumstance/counterexample to render an entire general theorem such as that incorrect.