2

Prove that $$a^2 + b^2 = c^2$$ $$ab = 6d^2$$ $$\gcd(a,b) = 1$$ has no solutions $(a,b,c,d) \in \mathbb N^4$.

Put $a = p^2 - q^2, b = 2pq, c= p^2 + q^2$ where $(p,q) = 1$, and $p - q \equiv 1 \bmod 2$ (i.e., one is odd, the other is even.) Then, $$pq(p+q)(p-q) = 3d^2$$ $\{p,q,p+q,p-q\}$ are pairwise coprime. I thank Thomas Andrews for his thoughts and help with a similar (now deleted) question, which helped me make progress on this problem.

The following cases arise:

  1. $p = 3x_1^2, q = x_2^2, p+q = x_3^2, p-q = x_4^2$.

$3x_1^2 + x_2^2 = x_3^2$ gives $x_2^2 = x_3^2 \bmod 3$. $3x_1^2 = x_4^2 + x_2^2$ gives $x_4^2 + x_2^2 = 0 \bmod 3$, forcing $x_2^2 = x_3^2 = x_4^2 = 0 \bmod 3$. So, $3 \mid q$, which contradicts $(p,q) = 1$.

  1. $p = x_1^2, q = 3x_2^2, p+q = x_3^2, p-q = x_4^2$.

In this case, we get $x_1^2 = x_3^2 = x_4^2 = 1 \bmod 3$. I haven't been able to finish this part.

  1. $p = x_1^2, q = x_2^2, p+q = 3x_3^2, p-q = x_4^2$.

We have $x_1^2 + x_2^2 = 3x_3^2 = 0 \bmod 3$, forcing $x_1^2 = x_2^2 = 0 \bmod 3$. This contradicts $(p,q) = 1$.

  1. $p = x_1^2, q = x_2^2, p+q = x_3^2, p-q = 3x_4^2$.

$x_1^2 + x_2^2 = x_3^2 \bmod 3$, and $x_1^2 = x_2^2 \bmod 3$. Since $x_3^2 = 0$ or $1 \bmod 3$, we have $x_1^2 = x_2^2 = x_3^2 = 0 \bmod 3$, contradicting $(p,q) = 1$.

I need help with case ($2$) only, assuming the other cases are correctly done. Thank you!

2 Answers2

1

Added, September 13: in the book by Sally, Chapter 2 is called Rational Right Triangles and the Congruent Number Problem, pages47-122. Section 8 is pages 96-101. Theorem 8.8 is that 3 is not a congruent number, proof according to Genocchio (1855), pages 99-101. I see, Exercise 8.10 on page 101 is to prove that any prime $p \equiv 3 \pmod 8$ is not a congruent number. It uses exercise 8.9, that when prime $p \equiv 3 \pmod 8,$ the ideal generated by $p$ in $ \mathbb Z [\sqrt 2 ] $ is a prime ideal.

your case 2 has $$x_1^2 + 3 x_2^2 = x_3^2 $$ while $$x_1^2 - 3 x_2^2 = x_4^2 $$

There are no such $(x_1, x_2)$ integers with both nonzero.

The phrase is "$3$ is not a congruent number"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congruent_number

https://oeis.org/A003273

For example, Genocchi proved that no prime number $p \equiv 3 \pmod 8$ is a congruent number. Later he invented dumplings with dough composed of a simple combination of wheat flour, egg, salt, and potato.

Worth learning how to prove $3$ by infinite descent. Bastien listed the congruent numbers up to 100 in a brief note 1915 , volume 22 of L'intermediaire des Math, pages 231-232. title Nombres Congruents.

Alright, Keith Conrad says that Fermat proved $2$ and $3$ not congruent.

Modern treatment: pages 96-101 in Roots to Research by Sally,

preview: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Roots_to_Research/nHxBw-WlECUC?hl=en&gbpv=1&printsec=frontcover

Will Jagy
  • 139,541
0

For case 2, we could use the trick of Fermat's Infinite Descent.

Observe that $$\left(\dfrac{x_3+x_4}{2}\right)^2+\left(\dfrac{x_3-x_4}{2}\right)^2=x_1^2$$, and $3|x_3-x_4$. So we let $\dfrac{x_3+x_4}{2}=m^2-n^2, x_3-x_4=2mn, x_1=m^2+n^2$, where $m,n$ are positive integers and $(m,n)=1$. Then we have $x_3=m^2+2mn-n^2$. On the other hand, we have $x_3^2-x_1^2=3x_2^2$, which becomes $$4mn(m^2-n^2)=3x_2^2$$ So $x_2$ is even, let it be $2l$. Then the equation becomes $$mn(m+n)(m-n)=l^2$$ Now we see that $(p,q,d),(m,n,l)$ are solutions of $xy(x+y)(x-y)=3z^2$. If we assume $(p,q,d)$ is the smallest solution (in terms of the sum), which clearly should exist, then we will produce $(m,n,l)$ which is even smaller, contradiction.

MafPrivate
  • 4,033