1

I think this answer is wrong.

Let $q$ be a prime congruent to $3$ mod $4$, prove the quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(q)$ is a field with $q^2$ elements

Answer

It is written that

I think computing the quotient (as sugggested in the other answer) is the easiest way to solve this. Nevertheless here is an alternative:

If you are fine about $\mathbb Z[i]/(q)$ being a field, you can find the number of elements by looking only at the abelian group structure.

As an $\mathbb Z[i]$ is generated by $1,i$, hence so is $G := \mathbb Z[i]/(q)$. $1$ and $i$ have order $q$ in $\mathbb Z[i]/(q)$. So we have two subgroups $A = \langle 1 \rangle, B =\langle i \rangle$ of order $q$ with $G=AB$ and $A \cap B=0$ (since they have both prime order, they are either equal or have trivial intersection), which implies $G = A \times B \cong \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z$.

Why is this answer wrong ?

Here $A \cap B = q$ but in answer it is written that $A \cap B=0$ that is totally wrong

Also, $\gcd(q,q)=q \neq 1 \implies \mathbb Z[i]/(q) \not \simeq \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z$

$\mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z$ is not integral domain

My thinking:

$\mathbb Z[i]/(q) \not \simeq \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z$

Because take $f:\mathbb Z[i] \to \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z \times \mathbb Z/q\mathbb Z$ defined by $(a+bi) \to (a\mod q,b\mod q)$ is not a homomorphism with kernal $(q)$

Shaun
  • 44,997
wasiu
  • 421
  • I think the given answer is wrong@Surb then why this answer had been accepted? – wasiu Aug 19 '22 at 11:53
  • 3
    This can happen sometimes... – Surb Aug 19 '22 at 11:54
  • 3
    Hint: $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(q) \cong \mathbb{F}_q[X]/(X^2+1)$ – Ben Aug 19 '22 at 12:05
  • 4
    @Surb the answer is correct; MooS is not saying that $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(q)$ and $\mathbb{Z}/(q)\times\mathbb{Z}/(q)$ are isomorphic as rings, but rather that they are isomorphic as abelian groups, which is true. note their comment, that if you already know $\mathbb{Z}[i]/(q)$ is a field, all you need to do is find its size, and you can do this by just considering it as an abelian group – Atticus Stonestrom Aug 19 '22 at 12:15

1 Answers1

5

If the isomorphism is an isomorphism of additive groups then the statement is true. Not necessarily if this is supposed to be an isomorphism of rings though, depending on $q \bmod 4$.

Since we are in a PID The ideal $(q)$ is prime iff $q$ is prime iff $q$ is irreducible iff $(q)$ is maximal etc.

This is known to happen iff $q \equiv 3 \bmod 4$. Otherwise $q = (x+iy)(x-iy)$ for some integers $x$ and $y$.

When we quotient by $(q)$ this will give a field in the case where $(q)$ is maximal, and will fail to be an integral domain (it will have zero divisors) in the case where $q$ is reducible.

There is only one unique field of order $q^2$, and its multiplicative group is cyclic of order $q^2-1$ (we exclude only zero)

Edit - Thanks for the MathJax tip. Now that I slightly know what I'm doing I'll add a little more:

Additionally, if we want to see that there are exactly $q^2$ many elements in the quotient, observe that a set of (additive) coset representatives could be $\{ a+bi \in \mathbb{Z}[i] : 0 \leq a,b < q \} $, as any element of $\mathbb{Z}[i]$ differs from an element of this set by something in $q\mathbb{Z}[i]$, whereas elements of this set never differ from each other by something in $q\mathbb{Z}[i]$.