the question comes from vector and determinants.
we all know that two 2D vectors v, and w, is a parallelogram. and half this is an triangle. they can be found by the determinant.
i wanted to extend it to 3D, and there are no problem in that we just find the Volume instead of an area. the structure is now a parallelepiped structure. Parralelepiped
but what structure is derived from the half method for finding a triangle, now in 3D.
it became to trigy for me to justify it, since if one looks at the picture cutting from v to W (their arrows). then this is clear, but do I also need to cut between say u and v, or/and u and w.
another reasoning is cutting in half is equal to half the volume thus we can only cut it ones (do people get this)
and is this cutting the v and w, or one of the other combinations or are this actually not important.
another thing for 2D, 2 variables, we use 1/2 the area for a triangle. should I for 3D 3 variables do 1/3
if any body asking what are you trying to find. i just want to know if taking half the Determinant of a parallelepiped what structure comes.
and if it is not a triangle, and I want a triangle. then should I use 1/3 of the determiant to find its volume for the structure is this doing half of v and w, plus half of u and v, and/or u and w. so we cut 2 times or cur 3 times
lastly if 3D cutting equivalent of 2D, is this 1/3 of Determinat then is this extended to higher dimensions by Rn needs 1/n of the determinant
another way of saying it: is if 2d is 1/2, is 3d 1/3, 4d 1/4,...