Why post this question again
I don't think earlier posts reviewed a number of the textbooks I'm interested in, and haven't considered my criteria.
My background
At the graduate level, I've self-studied the material below. Note that I do zoom-meet with a post-doc analyst math tutor once a week, and I typically take a full exam and review it with him before moving to the next course.
- Abstract Algebra (Dummit). I covered 2 semesters worth of material. This was early in my graduate studies, and I think my study habits were much weaker/my math maturity level was lower.
- Topology (Gamelin). First 2 sections (Chapters 1-13). Fairly strong grasp of material and proofs, good result on the exam.
- Real Analysis (Stein and Shakarchi). I followed a Cornell course in terms of reading and homework. I didn't spend enough time understanding some proofs, and I didn't do enough problems on important topics (I'm working on Measure Theory by Axler now to remedy this, see below).
- Introduction to Manifolds (Tu). I read this cover-to-cover, had a good grasp of the proofs and exposition in general, and worked many problems per section. I like how this book has short sections with exercises at the end. The exposition/ease of understanding the proofs was excellent.
- Measure, Integration & Real Analysis (Axler). This is a model graduate level book for me. It has the perfect balance of clarity in the proofs, concision, but also intentionally leaving some gaps for the reader to complete ("as you should verify.."). I'm only in to the second section, but the proof style/exposition are slightly more challenging than Loring Tu's book -- but this level is ideal for me. Like in Tu, this book has short sections with many problems after each short section section.
My criteria for an Algebraic Topology text
A ranked list by importance is below (some of the rankings were difficult).
- The right level of difficulty for exposition/proofs (see Axler and Tu for examples, above).
- Sections aren't longer than about 10 pages, with exercises at the end. Books with 20-30+ pages without exercises are much less readable for me. It's harder to focus on learning 1-2 important results with this kind of book format.
- Hints/solutions in the back of the book. Axler is possibly changing my mind about this, but it was helpful to have hints in the Tu and Gamelin books (especially when it's only a hint). But I'm possibly gaining more insights with Axler, because the cost of finding solutions is higher (you can still look on stackexchange, but may not find anything).
- PDF/electronic version. This is almost a requirement, but all of the books I'm interested in have this anyway.
Possible Algebraic Topology texts.
Hatcher. This book doesn't seem to have my 1-3 criteria. I know it's the main recommendation for an introductory text. From my brief review, I noticed that the sections are very long, the style of exposition possibly wasn't to my liking. The overall difficulty level may be a bit too high for my first foray into the subject.
Shastri. What do people think about the proof difficulty/exposition/overall quality of this book? I haven't seen any posts that specifically address this. I notice that the sections are short, there's hints in the back of the book. The proofs have some "as you should verify" in them like Axler. Is this a good self-study book for my level?
Bredon. This one looks fairly readable and approachable. How does the difficulty level compare to other books? Exposition?
Rotman. This one seemed approachable and had very short sections
Fulton. This one looked possibly too easy and appeared to have less depth/breadth than other texts.
Massey (A Basic Course in Algebraic Topology). This book looks a more advance, is likely less accessible than what I need. His easier book (the Introduction book) seems to leave out cohomology theory and other items I want to have covered.
How to helpfully respond
When you review/recommend a book, please explain how it fits in with my criteria. My initial guess is that Shastri, Bredon, or Rotman might be the best fit for me. I'd really like to get people's feedback on these books especially.