0

I have tried factorisation by trial using factor theorem, to no avail. The expression is neither cyclic nor reciprocal. I have also tried arrangement and grouping of terms. I have run out of ideas to factorise this expression. Please help me out. Thanks.

4 Answers4

2

It is easy to see that the polynomial has no root over the finite field $\Bbb F_5$. So it is irreducible in $\Bbb F_5[x]$ and hence also in $\Bbb Z[x]$ and $\Bbb Q[x]$. So there is no way to factor it.

Reference:

On the irreducibility of a polynomial and Gauss lemma

Dietrich Burde
  • 130,978
0

Since $\pm 1,\pm 2,\pm 4$ aren't roots of the equation, the polinomial is irreducible over rationals. You need the cubic root formula if you want to compute the roots

0

Let's consider the cubic equation,
x³+ 6x² + 13x + 4 = 0 terms can be rearranged to get,
(x+2)³ + (x+2) = 6 and compared with the identity , (a + b )³ -3ab(a+b)= a³ + b³,
Now you get x+2 = a+b, -3ab = 1 and a³ + b³ = 6,
Last two equations you can solve to find a and b , and finally by the first equation you can find x .
Now you can obtain factors of the given cubic polynomial.
Added this for your more convenient ,
When you solve two equations of a, b by eliminating b , you get quadratic equation of and you can use quadratic formula to find two roots of , now by the symmetry of equations of a,b you can say one root is for and the other root is for . Then by getting the cube root of those values you can find a,b and you have only one real root a+b and a linear factor is given by x +2 -(a+b). By equating the coefficients you can obtain the other factor that is a quadratic .
To verify you can differentiate the polynomial function with respect to x and the derivative can not be zero because the discriminant of the quadratic equation is negative. Therefore by the shape of the graph there should be only one linear factor.

  • I believe the method used here is correct and simplifications too. Since the values you get for a³ are in surd form (irrationals) and you need to get cube root of them, numerical form is much complicated , therefore I have not provided the final values. I hope given guidance may be enough to solve the problem. Your suggestions are greatly appreciated. – Janaka Rodrigo Jul 11 '22 at 02:09
0

We can disprove all rational roots with minimum trials by girst noting that the cubic and quadratic terms match

$(x+2)^3=x^3+6x^2+12x+8.$

So with $y=x+2$ we have

$x^3+6x^2+13x+4=y^3+x-4=y^3+y-6.$

Then any real root for $x^3+6x^2+13x+4=0$ must satisfy $x<0$ and $y=x+2>0$, and the only candidate allowed by the Rational Root Theorem which satisfies this inequality is $-1$ (which is easily seen to fail).

Oscar Lanzi
  • 39,403