0

Let $(X,F,\nu)$ be a signed measure on the sigma algebra F. now by Jordan-Hahn decomposition theorem $\nu = \nu_1 - \nu_2$, where $\nu_1$ and $\nu_2$ are positive and mutually singular, and such measures are unique.

now to prove

$$\sup_{\text{finite partitions $E_k$ of $X$}} \sum_{1 \leq k \leq n} | \nu(E_k) | = \nu_1 + \nu_2$$

I am stuck to show this plz help me..

HallaSurvivor
  • 38,115
  • 4
  • 46
  • 87

1 Answers1

0

Let $|\nu| = \nu_1 + \nu_2$. By the triangle inequality, for any $E \subset X$, $|\nu(E)| \leq |\nu|(E)$. For any finite partition $E_1, \dots, E_n$ of $X$, $$\sum_{k}|\nu(E_k)| \leq \sum_{k}|\nu|(E_k) = |\nu|(X).$$ This shows that the sup is $\leq |\nu|(X)$. To get the other inequality, let $E_1, E_2$ be a Hahn decomposition for $X$.

Mason
  • 10,415
  • I really did not get aftethe last lie by "Hahn decomposition" ..Since i tried it for yesterday , several times i tried to use the fact they are singular which yu are talking named "Hahn decomposition",but really i am failed to use this fact in the exact place wwhere it is needed.That's why i am stuck..Can you plz help me out by giving some more hints plz ,i am really stuck on it since yesterday. – Vishnudasa Srinivasan Jul 09 '22 at 05:09
  • @VishnudasaSrinivasan $\nu(E_1) = \nu_1(X)$ and $\nu(E_2) = -\nu_2(X)$ – Mason Jul 09 '22 at 05:19
  • it was helpful i finally did it thanks.. particularly this lie underlying the language of singularity i did not look so closely that's why i ws stuck to use singularity.. – Vishnudasa Srinivasan Jul 09 '22 at 05:36