This old question recently popped up, and I thought about how I would answer it. My approach was nothing like the approaches in the given answers, which makes me wonder, Is my approach invalid in some way?
Edited to account for objection raised in answer by Lukas Heger
I reasoned that a product of a finite number of finite integers cannot become infinite. Thus, if $n=\prod p_i^{a_i}$, then $n \rightarrow \infty$ only if one or more of $p_i \rightarrow \infty$, or if $i \rightarrow \infty$, or if one or more of $a_i \rightarrow \infty$ (or some combination of those). These conditions are sufficient to ensure that the product representing $n$ will have either an infinite number of prime factors (not necessarily distinct) or have prime factors that are arbitrarily large.
In any case it will be true that $\phi(n)=\prod (p_i-1)p_i^{a_i-1} \rightarrow \infty$ because necessarily one or more of $(p_i-1) \rightarrow \infty$ or $i \rightarrow \infty$ or one or more of $(a_i-1) \rightarrow \infty$
Am I right, or have I missed something?