2

Let $U$ be an open set in $\mathbb{R}^2$. How to prove that the boundary of the CLOSURE of $U$ has Lebesgue measure 0 ? Thanks.

1 Answers1

7

It appears that the statement in your question is not always true. See https://mathoverflow.net/questions/25993/sets-with-positive-lebesgue-measure-boundary for excellent answers. For related details, see also Regular open set whose boundary has nonzero volume. and https://mathoverflow.net/questions/24264/a-question-about-the-osgood-curve.

guest
  • 86
  • 2
    In fact, it's not hard to find examples where the measure of $U$ is arbitrarily small while the closure is the entire ${\bf R}^2$, just consider small balls around a countable dense subset. – tomasz Jul 19 '13 at 08:49
  • @tomasz I agree; however, the boundary of $\mathbb{R}^2$ is the empty set and thus has measure zero. So, I don't think it's a counterexample to the OP's claim. – Amitesh Datta Jul 19 '13 at 09:05
  • Thanks, I understand. Your links are helpful. I am preparing for my qualifying exam, and this problem is in the collection of past exams, so I didn't expect it to be wrong. Thank you very much for your help. – Boyu Zhang Jul 19 '13 at 09:24