1

A nilpotent three-dimensional Lie algebra is either abelian ("commutative") or isomorphic to $n_3$.

  • We say that a lie-algeba $L$ is nilpotent if there exists $N$ such that $C^N(L) = 0$ where

$L=C^1(L) > [L,L]=C^2 (L) > [L,[L,L]]=C^3 (L)>...$

  • $n_3={A \in gl_3 : a_{ij}=0 , i \geq j}$.

    $n_3$= span {$E_{12} , E_{23}, E_{13}$}, Here $E_{12}$ denotes the $3\times 3$ matrix with $1$ if $(i,j)=(1,2)$ and $0$ otherwise (same for the two other matrices).

  • Every abelian algebra is nilpotent.

  • There is a theorem : $L$ is a solvable lie algebra if and only if there is a sequence of ideals $L > I_ 0 > I_ 1>...>I_ n = 0$ such that $I_k / I_{k+1}$ is an abelian quotient. And knowing that every nilpotent Lie- algebra is solvable.

Can this theorem be used to show the above claim?

Mittens
  • 39,145

1 Answers1

3

There is a direct proof by using the dimension of $[L,L]$. So let $m=\dim([L,L])$. If $m=0$, then $L$ is abelian. If $m=3$, then $L=[L,L]$ is perfect and hence not solvable. So then $L$ also is not nilpotent. If $m=2$, then we also can show that $L$ is not nilpotent. Indeed, then $L$ has zero center and hence cannot be nilpotent.

So we are left with $m=1$. Suppose first that $[L,L]\subset Z(L)$ and let $[L,L]=Fz$, where $F$ is the field. We can extend $z$ to a basis $(x,y,z)$ of $L$. Because of $z\in Z(L)$ we have $[x,z]=[y,z]=0$. We may assume that $[x,y]=z$. Then $L$ is isomorphic to the Heisenberg Lie algebra $\mathfrak{n}_3(F)$.

If $[L,L]=Fy$ is not contained in the center of $L$, then there exists an $x'\in L$ with $[x',y]\neq 0$. Since $\dim [L,L]=1$, we have $[x',y]=\alpha y$, and therefore $[x,y]=y$ with $x=\alpha^{-1}x'$. The subalgebra $\mathfrak{a}=Fx+Fy$ hence is isomorphic to $\mathfrak{r}_2(F)$, the unique non-abelian Lie algebra over $F$ of dimension $2$. It is not nilpotent. This implies that $L$ is not nilpotent.

Dietrich Burde
  • 130,978
  • Thanks a lot. I have some basic questions: * if $m=0$ then $L$ is abelian trivially? * If $L=[L,L]$ why is $L$ is not solvable? (Is this by def) * if $Z(L)=0$ why is $L$ not nilpotent? – user652838 Apr 15 '22 at 16:51
  • 1
    A Lie algebra $L$ with $[L,L]=L$ cannot have the derived series ending with zero, except for $L=0$. But $L$ is solvable if and only if the derived series ends with $0$. A nilpotent Lie algebras always has non-trivial center, see this post. The good thing of this site is that all your questions from above have an answer here. You just have to start reading the posts here. – Dietrich Burde Apr 15 '22 at 16:54