0

Let $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ denote the set of all homeomorphisms from $\mathbb{R}$ to itself and define the following metric on $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ : $d(f,g) = sup_{x \in \mathbb{R}}|f(x)-g(x)|$

Is there a continuous function from the interval $[0,1]$ to $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ such that $0$ is mapped to $f(x) = x$ and $1$ is mapped to $g(x) = -x$?

My first guess was to take the function that maps each $a \in [0,1]$ to the function $(1-2a)x$ but I don't think this map would be continuous because if you take any two distinct $a,b \in [0,1]$, we have that $d((1-2a)x,(1-2b)x)$ is infinitely large, so I don't think this map could be continuous. This makes me think that there is no continuous function as above actually, because the distance between $f(x)$ and $g(x)$ themselves is infinitely large.

Is this right? If so, how would you write a formal proof of this? If not, then what is the continuous function from $[0,1]$ to $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ that maps $0$ to $x$ and $1$ to $-x$?

123123
  • 296
  • $d$ is not a metric since it can take the value $\infty$. – Kavi Rama Murthy Apr 06 '22 at 08:48
  • @KaviRamaMurthy I did notice that and asked my lecturer about it. I think the idea is to really just "ignore" when the distance is infinity. – 123123 Apr 06 '22 at 08:51
  • You can't just "ignore" the core issue with your "metric". Since the metric is not well defined, then continuity is not well defined as well. This whole question is invalid. – freakish Apr 06 '22 at 16:09
  • Are you sure? The question is in my Lecture notes for my topology course at University and this topology on the set $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ is used a few times. – 123123 Apr 06 '22 at 16:58
  • Yes, I'm sure. What makes sense is to talk about compact-open topology on $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$. In that case continuous paths are the same as classical homotopies. In other words you have to show that if $H:[0,1]\times\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a homotopy such that $H(0,x)=x$ and $H(1,x)=-x$ then there is $t$ such that $H(t,\cdot)$ is not a homeomorphism. – freakish Apr 06 '22 at 17:04
  • There is no problem with $\infty$. See https://math.stackexchange.com/q/399722. – Paul Frost Apr 07 '22 at 00:23

1 Answers1

0

As mentioned in the comments, it is a bit unusual to consider a "metric" which is allowed to take the value $\infty$, but we can work with a more general definition of "metric" as discussed in Metric assuming the value infinity.

This approach via the generalized metric $d$ gives us a topology on $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$. Moreover, it is easy to verify that the same topology is induced by the ordinary metric $d_1(f,g) = \min (1,d(f,g))$.

Assume that there exists a continuous map $u : I = [0,1] \to Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ such that $u(0) = id$ and $u(1) = -id$. Since $I$ is compact, $u$ is uniformly continuous and therefore we can find $n \in \mathbb N$ such that $d(u(t),u(s)) \le 1$ for $\lvert t - s \rvert \le 1/n$. This shows that $$d(u(0),u(1)) \le \sum_{i=1}^n d\left(u\left(\frac{i-1}{n}\right), u\left(\frac{i}{n}\right)\right) \le n .$$ But clearly $d(id,-id) = \infty$, a contradiction.

A perhaps more natural way to topologize $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ is to use the compact open topology (see freakish's comment). But let us take yet another topology on $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ : The topology of pointwise convergence. A subbasis for this topology is given by the sets $M(x,U) = \{ f \in Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}) \mid f(x) \in U \}$, where $x \in \mathbb R$ and $U \subset \mathbb R$ is open. This topology is coarser then your metric topology and coarser than the compact-open topology. We shall show that there exists no continuous path from $id$ to $-id$ with respect to the topology of pointwise convergence, which is a much stronger result than that proved above.

Let us define $$H_+ = \{f \in Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}) \mid f(1) > f(0) \} , \\ H_- = \{f \in Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R}) \mid f(1) < f(0) \} .$$

These sets form a partition of $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ into disjoint subsets.

The set $H_+$ is open: Let $f \in H_+$ which means $f(1) > f(0)$. Let $r = (f(1) - f(0))/2$. Then $f \in W = S(1, (f(1) - r,\infty)) \cap S(0, (-\infty, f(0) + r))$. The set $W$ is open in $Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ . For $g \in W$ we have $g(1) \in (f(1) - r,\infty)$ and $g(0) \in (-\infty, f(0) + r)$. This implies $g(1) > g(0)$, i.e. $g \in H_+$. Thus $f \in W \subset H_+$.

Similarly $H_-$ is open.

Now let $u : I \to Top^h(\mathbb{R},\mathbb{R})$ be a continuous path. The sets $I_\pm = u^{-1}(H_\pm)$ form a partition of $I$ into disjoint open subsets. Since $I$ is connected, one of $I_\pm$ must be empty and the other $= I$.

This shows that there is no continuous path connecting an element of $H_+$ with an element of $H_-$. But $id \in H_+$ and $-id \in H_-$.

Paul Frost
  • 76,394
  • 12
  • 43
  • 125