My "proof" would be as follows:
ε2 = 0 ln 0 = ln ε2 ln x2 = 2 ln x ln 0 = 2 ln ε
(a=b=ε) isn't really necessary.
ln 0 = ln ab ln ab = ln a + ln b
If ln(0) is always undefined, then it implies ln(ε) must be as well, right? (Or the sum ln(a)+ln(b) is undefined, which technically leaves room for defined ln(a) and ln(b) without defined addition, whatever that means.)
I think I know from the definition of exp(xε) that ln(ε) should be undefined. My confusion comes from the fact that there are all different definitions of multiplication that have implications for the addition of exponents, e.g. exp(i+j) ≠ exp(j+i) in quaternions. So... couldn't there be all different definitions of addition and its identities? Is exp necessarily nonzero no matter how you define zero?
I tried to work with c := ln(0); exp(c) = 0
but I couldn't really reason about its properties.
x?y = floor(x/y) + T(x%y)
that are conserved. – John P Mar 10 '22 at 22:44