The following section is the start of a proof to show that integration is the inverse of differentiation:
Consider an integral $F(x) = \int_{b}^{a} f(x) \ dx$.
Let $F(x) = \int_{a}^{x} f(u) \ du $.
It is apparent that $F(x)$ is a continuous function of $x$ and $F(x+h) = \int_{a}^{x+h} f(u) \ du = \int_{a}^{x} f(u) \ du + \int_{x}^{x+h} f(u) \ du = F(x) + \int_{x}^{x+h} f(u) \ du$
Rearranging and dividing through we get $\frac{F(x+h) - F(x)}{h} = \frac{1}{h}\int_{x}^{x+h} f(u) \ du$. Finally, taking the limit as $h \rightarrow 0$ the LHS becomes $\frac{dF}{dx}$ and the RHS becomes $f(x)$.
I have several questions about this proof I don't understand:
From line one to line two, for what substitution $u$ where $u$ is some function of $x$ is this true? The transformation from [1] to [2] is not obvious to me.
How is it apparent $F(x)$ is continuous (intuitively, only the case if $f(x)$ is continuous)?
The final line appears to me to hand-wave away the limit as $h \rightarrow 0$ of $\frac{1}{h}$ which should be undefined to my knowledge. In any case, it seems invalid unless $\lim_{h\rightarrow 0} \frac{1}{h} = 1$ which I find unlikely.
Thanks!