1

For any set $X$ of size $n \geqslant 4$, what is the maximum cardinality of a family $\mathscr F$ of subsets of $X$ such that $\vert A \vert =4$ for all $A \in \mathscr F$, and $\vert A \cap B \vert \leqslant 1$ for all distinct $A,B \in \mathscr F$? More generally, for any $1 \leqslant m \leqslant n$, what is the maximum size of a family $\mathscr F$ of subsets of $\{1,,\ldots,n\}$ such that $\vert A \vert = m$ for all $A \in \mathscr F$, and $\vert A \cap B \vert \leqslant m$ for all distinct $A,B \in \mathscr F$?

1 Answers1

1

On page number 190 (Section 13.6) of the book "Extremal Combinatorics, Second Edition" by Jukna, the following result, attributed to Frankl and Wilson, is proved:

If $L\subset \mathbb{N}$ is a finite set of integers and if $F$ is a family of subsets of an $n$ element set such that for all $A, B \in F$, $A \neq B$, $|A\cap B| \in L$, then $|F|\leq \sum_{i = 0}^{|L|}\binom{n}{i}$.

user1001001
  • 5,143
  • 2
  • 22
  • 53
  • Applied to the first part of the Question, where $L = {0,1}$, this gives the upper bound $|\mathscr F| \le 1 + n + n(n-1)/2$. – hardmath Jan 08 '22 at 17:05
  • Thank you. However, we need the additional constraint $|A|=|B|=k$ (e.g., $k=4$), which certainly reduces the cardinality of the upper bound. – user462634 Jan 09 '22 at 08:16
  • @user462634 Possibly, although its not immediately obvious that the bound can be pushed down in the case when cardinalities are equal. – user1001001 Jan 09 '22 at 13:14