3

I find the proof of diffoemorphism in Guillemin & Pallock's Differential Topology 1.3.3 is more or less independent of the fact that the manifold happen to be $\mathbb{R}$, and therefore are the same.

Then I am asking if my two proofs (primarily the latter one) are correct.

GP 1.3.3: Let $f: \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}$ be a local diffeomorphism. Prove that the image of $f$ is an open interval and that, in fact $f$ maps $\mathbb{R}$ diffeomorphically onto this interval.

Proof: Since local diffeomorphism implies $f$ and $f^{-1}$ are globally smooth, it suffices to show that the local diffeomorphism $f: \mathbb{R} \to$ image$f$ is a bijection. We know it's surjective since we restricted to its image. But if it is not surjective, by mean value theorem, there is some point $x \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $f'(x) = 0$. However, the pushforward $df_{U_x}$ at $x$ must be a linear isomorphism. This is a contradiction.

And right after:

GP 1.3.5: Prove that a local diffeomorphism $f: X \rightarrow Y$ is actually a diffeomorphism of $X$ onto an open subset of $Y$, provided that $f$ is one-to-one.

Proof: Since local diffeomorphism implies $f$ are globally smooth and $f^{-1}$ are globally smooth within the image of $f$, it suffices to show that the local diffeomorphism $f: X \to$ image$f \subseteq Y$ is a bijection. We know it's surjective since we restricted to its image. Given $f$ is one-to-one, it is bijective. Hence a diffeomorphism onto an open subset of $Y$.

WishingFish
  • 2,412
  • What is GP? Here and elsewhere you seem to be quoting from somewhere, but never bothered to tell us where form, afaics? – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 02 '13 at 00:22
  • Notice that here you did not ask anything... – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 02 '13 at 00:23
  • It is Guillemin & Pallock's Differential Topology – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 00:23
  • 1
    Like I said, I did not know that the fact I used in 1.3.3 was stated as a problem in 1.3.5, but your proof of 1.3.5 is problematic. – Ink Jul 02 '13 at 00:25
  • Oh @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez , I mean, it two problems on the textbook are identical to my eyes, then probably I am wrong somewhere. So I am asking for the distinction - and if I understand the distinction correctly, that 1.3.5 is just an extension of 1.3.3 from $\mathbb{R}$ to a general manifold, then I am asking if my two proofs (primarily the latter on) are correct. – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 00:25
  • Oh @Ink... Could you tell me where went wrong.. – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 00:26
  • 1
    Please add all the relevant information and the actual question to the body of the question itself. In particular, I do not see where you aked a question. – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Jul 02 '13 at 00:26
  • @MarianoSuárez-Alvarez ok, added. – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 00:28
  • 2
    I think the idea is that the $\mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ case is easily visualisable, so you first get an easy one to warm up. Then you get the general one, to see what parts you actually needed, and which special properties of $\mathbb{R}$ that you may have used for the first were actually irrelevant. – Daniel Fischer Jul 02 '13 at 00:46
  • @WishingFish why local diffeomorphism implies inverse f is globally smooth ? – bytrz Aug 24 '15 at 15:26

3 Answers3

4

The problem with your first proof is this:

  1. Why is $f$ an open map?
  2. Why is the image an interval?
  3. Also tautologically $f$ is surjective onto its image so what's going on with the MVT in 1.3.3?

Well the first actually this follows immediately from $f$ being a local diffeomorphism! For any $f(y) \in f(\Bbb{R})$, $f$ a local diffeomorphism implies there is $U$ open about $y$ such that $f(U)$ is open in $\Bbb{R}$ about $f(y)$. Necessarily $f(U) \subseteq f(\Bbb{R})$ and so immediately this means $f(\Bbb{R})$ is open. For 2) the image is an interval because $f(\Bbb{R})$ is an open connected set which is an interval from basic real analysis. To complete the problem, you just need to tell us why $f$ is injective: If $x,y$ with $x\neq y$ are such that $f(x) = f(y)$, the MVT implies there is $d$ between $x$ and $y$ so that $f'(d) = 0$. Now how does this contradict what we have?

Exercise: Complete the proof above for why $f$ has to be injective with the following hints:

<ol>
<li><p>Let $M$ be a smooth manifold. For any $U \subseteq M$ open and $p\in M$, $T_pM \cong T_pU$.</p></li>
<li><p>A functor always takes isomorphisms to isomorphisms. If $f'(d) = 0$ then the induced map on tangent spaces at $d$ is the (.....) map.</p></li>
</ol>
  • 1
    I think, there is a mistype in the problem: The sentence starting by "But if it is not surjective" should rather be "But if it is not bijective".. – Berci Jul 02 '13 at 00:57
  • A functor always takes isomorphisms to isomorphisms. If $f'(d) = 0$ then the induced map on tangent spaces at $d$ is the (identity) map?
  • – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 01:43
  • However, for 1, I don't really know how to prove. Can you give me some hint? – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 01:52
  • @WishingFish I just proved 1 for you. If $f'(d) = 0$, then this means that $f'$ is the zero map! –  Jul 02 '13 at 02:00
  • OH, I mean 1 in the exercise. – WishingFish Jul 02 '13 at 02:03