I'm working on a project analyzing how many research projects every EU region has been involved in in 2020. My lists show (1) the number of projects each region joined as coordinator, and (2) how many projects the region joined as participant. I want to generate a ratio between these two values to check to what extent they are more geared to coordinating or to participating.
I'm trying to get a value above zero if they are more coordinating than participating, and below zero if the opposite happens. Zero means they coordinate as much as they participate. To do that, I'm using the formula (#PARTICIPANT - #COORDINATOR)/#COORDINATOR. For instance, if they were participants in 30 projects and coordinators in 9, I get (30-9)/9 = 2.333. So far so good.
However, in cases where #COORDINATOR is bigger than #PARTICIPANT (i.e. the end result is negative), the results vary only between $0$ and $-1$. Using the values above as illustration, but inverted, I get $(9-30)/30 = 0.7$. Therefore, I get results which are impossible to mutually compare although they should basically communicate the same - in both cases, a region is "equally" more playing one role than the other.
So, in short, is there a way to make these results consistent both for negative and positive values? A way to immediately see that no matter what the direction of the imbalance, the ratio between both roles is the same. Thanks in advance.