3

May somebody show me the proof of the theorem: Lebesgue measure of a graph of continuous function is equal to $0$. I will be really grateful.

Anne
  • 1,557
  • First restrict the domain your function to a compact interval and think about what happens when you translate the graph up and down. – Tim kinsella Jun 19 '13 at 21:55
  • Duplicate? http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/108660/measure-zero-of-the-graph-of-a-continuous-function?rq=1 – DCT Jun 19 '13 at 22:18
  • As for a hint, all the essential ideas are in the case where the function is from [0,1] to R. Then, use uniform continuity to cover the graph with boxes of small height (by partitioning [0,1]). – DCT Jun 19 '13 at 22:19
  • @Dtseng Yeah this is a duplicate, although I'm surprised the proof I mentioned above isn't suggested in the duplicate post. Maybe I'm missing something. – Tim kinsella Jun 19 '13 at 22:27
  • 1
    I think it's a good idea (more clever than what I suggested), as I think it shows that if the graph is measurable, it has measure 0 (without continuity hypothesis). The only thing I think is that you first need to know the graph is measurable. The post http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/35606/lebesgue-measure-of-the-graph-of-a-function?rq=1 seems to be relevant. – DCT Jun 19 '13 at 22:39

1 Answers1

2

It rather depends on what you can use. If you know that the graph of a continuous function is closed, then it's obviously measurable. Then you can apply Fubini to its characteristic function to conclude that the measure is 0, simply because singletons have measure 0.