3

Simplify $$\sum_{k=0} \binom{n−2k} k$$ Or alternatively, show that it can't be simplified any more.

I tried Hockey stick identity but I had issues with the fact that the top had a -2k term. I then tried using $\binom {n+1}{k+1}$ = $\binom{n}{k} + \binom{n}{k+1}$, but again the -2k term means you can't add consecutive terms. Some values I calculated are

3 for n=4

4 for n=5

6 for n =6

9 for n=7.

There doesn't seem to be a pattern.

RobPratt
  • 45,619
  • What have you tried? – Guy Fsone Aug 24 '21 at 16:48
  • Hockey stick Identity and Pascals triangle additive identity, also I tried just bashing it with algebra and trying to cancel things. I have had no luck with anything like that.

    I have an inkling that this might be related to fibonacci sequences, but I'm not sure.

    – grand aneww Aug 24 '21 at 16:52
  • How can you show it can’t be simplified? Have you tried computing some values? – Thomas Andrews Aug 24 '21 at 16:53
  • yep, looks completely arbitrary and random to me. the values don't seem to have any real pattern. – grand aneww Aug 24 '21 at 16:53
  • Don’t tell us you did something, show us. Edit your question to show some work. – Thomas Andrews Aug 24 '21 at 16:55
  • http://oeis.org/A000930 – WhatsUp Aug 24 '21 at 17:11
  • It often takes a bit more than 7 terms to see a pattern. At least look at the differences of two consecutive terms (go more than 7). That often shows some structure. – robjohn Aug 25 '21 at 23:08
  • What I meant in my last comment was to look at $a_n-a_{n-1}$, which is the first order difference of the given sequence. Often the first, second, or higher order difference can start to tell something about the sequence in many cases (see finite difference). Try it for this sequence. – robjohn Aug 26 '21 at 10:14
  • If you try this and include it in your question, it will most likely be reopened. – robjohn Aug 27 '21 at 10:51

4 Answers4

3

We have that $\binom{n-2k}{k}=\binom{n-2k-1}{k-1}+\binom{n-2k-1}{k}$. Hence, $$\sum_{k=0} \binom{n-2k}{k}=\sum_{k=0}\binom{(n-1)-2k}{k-1}+\sum_{k=0} \binom{(n-1)-2k}{k}$$ If $a_n=\sum_{k=0} \binom{n-2k}{k}$, then we have $$a_n=a_{n-1}+\sum_{k=0} \binom{(n-1)-2k}{k-1}$$ $$a_n=a_{n-1}+\sum_{k=0} \binom{(n-1)-2(k-1)-2}{k-1}$$ $$a_n=a_{n-1}+\sum_{k=0} \binom{(n-3)-2(k-1)}{k-1}$$ Shifting the indices of this summation gives us $$a_n=a_{n-1}+\sum_{k=0} \binom{(n-3)-2k}{k}$$ $$a_n=a_{n-1}+a_{n-3}$$ The characteristic equation of this linear recurrence is $$x^3-x^2-1=0$$ Wolfram Alpha says that the roots of this equation are very complex. One could possibly solve for the explicit equation for the recurrence using the roots $r_1,r_2,r_3$. However, it would be tedious to find the values of constants $u,v,w$ that satisfy the initial conditions which yield $$a_n=ur_1^n+vr_2^n+wr_3^n$$

Alan Abraham
  • 5,142
  • 6
  • 20
2

This is only an alternative to find the recurrence relation above. The expression $\binom{n-k}{k}$ gives the number of solutions to the equation $n=\sum{x_{i}}\phantom{x}|\phantom{x}x_{i}\in\{1,3\}$ when there are $k$ threes. Therefore the following expression gives the number of possibilities to express $n$ as summation of ones and threes.

$$ a_{n}=\sum{\binom{n-2k}{k}} $$

There are only two possibilities for $x_{1}$. If $x_{1}=1$ then the other $x_{i}$ are ones and threes that sum up to $n-1$. If $x_{1}=3$ then the other $x_{i}$ are ones and threes that sum up to $n-3$. Hence the following recurrence relation:

$$ a_{n}=a_{n-1}+a_{n-3} $$

acat3
  • 11,897
1

Maybe expressing this sum using the Generalized Hypergeometric function may form a starting point for further simplifications:

$\binom{0}{\frac{n}{2}} \, _4F_3\left(\frac{1}{2},1,1,-\frac{n}{2};\frac{1}{3}-\frac{n}{6},\frac{2}{3}-\frac{n}{6},1-\frac{n}{6};-\frac{4}{27}\right)$

Hopefully there exist some identities or theorems (such as those from Saalschütz, Dixon or Dougall for example) that enable further simplifications.

1

Recursive Solution

Considering an old answer to a related problem, I tried $$ \begin{align} a_n &=\sum_k\binom{n-2k}{k}[3k\le n]\tag{1a}\\[3pt] &=\sum_k\binom{n-2k-1}{k}[3k\le n]+\sum_k\binom{n-2k-1}{k-1}[3k\le n]\tag{1b}\\[3pt] &=\sum_k\binom{n-2k-1}{k}[3k\le n]+\sum_k\binom{n-2k-3}{k}[3k+3\le n]\tag{1c}\\ &=a_{n-1}+\color{#C00}{\sum_k\binom{n-2k-1}{k}\overbrace{([3k\le n]-[3k\le n-1])}^{[n=3k]}}\tag{1d}\\ &\phantom{={}}+a_{n-3}+\color{#090}{\sum_k\binom{n-2k-3}{k}\overbrace{([3k+3\le n]-[3k\le n-3])}^0}\tag{1e}\\[12pt] &=a_{n-1}+a_{n-3}+\color{#C00}{[n=0]}+\color{#090}{0}\tag{1f}\\[21pt] &=a_{n-1}+a_{n-3}+[n=0]\tag{1g} \end{align} $$ Explanation:
$\text{(1b)}$: apply Pascal's Rule
$\text{(1c)}$: substitute $k\mapsto k+1$ in the second sum
$\text{(1d)}$: add and subtract $a_{n-1}$ from the left term of $\text{(1c)}$
$\text{(1e)}$: add and subtract $a_{n-3}$ from the right term of $\text{(1c)}$
$\text{(1f)}$: $\binom{k-1}{k}=[k=0]$
$\text{(1g)}$: simplify

$\text{(1a)}$ says that $a_n=0$ for $n\lt0$. $\text{(1g)}$ says that $a_0=1$, and for $n\gt0$, $$ a_n=a_{n-1}+a_{n-3}\tag2 $$ Thus, $$ \begin{array}{c|c}n&0&1&2&3&4&5&6&7&8\\\hline a_n&1&1&1&2&3&4&6&9&13\end{array} $$ Care needs to be taken with the upper limits of the sum, as shown in $\text{(1d)}$ and $\text{(1e)}$, but luckily, the terms cancel for $n\gt0$.


Solution to the Linear Recurrence Equation

A closed form solution to the constant coefficient linear recurrence equation takes the form $$\newcommand{\csch}{\operatorname{csch}} a_n=c_1r_1^n+c_2r_2^n+c_3r_3^n\tag3 $$ where $r_1,r_2,r_3$ are roots of $x^3-x^2-1=0$, which, if we substitute $x=t+\frac13$, becomes $t^3-\frac13t=\frac{29}{27}$. Multiplying the identity $4\cosh^3(u)-3\cosh(u)=\cosh(3u)$ by $\frac2{27}$ gives $$ \left(\frac23\cosh(u)\right)^3-\frac13\left(\frac23\cosh(u)\right)=\frac2{27}\cosh(3u)\tag4 $$ Applying $(4)$, we get the real root $$ r_1=\frac13+\frac23\cosh\left(\frac13\cosh^{-1}\left(\frac{29}2\right)\right)\tag5 $$ and then, because $r_1+r_2+r_3=r_1r_2r_3=1$, we can compute the complex roots $$ r_2=\frac{1-r_1}2+i\frac{\sqrt{3r_1^2-2r_1-1}}2\tag{6a} $$ and $$ r_3=\frac{1-r_1}2-i\frac{\sqrt{3r_1^2-2r_1-1}}2\tag{6b} $$ and we can compute the coefficients using Cramer's Rule and Vandermonde Determinants $$ c_1=\frac{\det\begin{bmatrix} 1&1&1\\ 1&r_2&r_3\\ 1&r_2^2&r_3^2 \end{bmatrix}} {\det\begin{bmatrix} 1&1&1\\ r_1&r_2&r_3\\ r_1^2&r_2^2&r_3^2 \end{bmatrix}} =\frac{r_1^2+1}{r_1^2+3}\tag{7a} $$ and similarly $$ c_2=\frac{r_2^2+1}{r_2^2+3}\tag{7b} $$ and $$ c_3=\frac{r_3^2+1}{r_3^2+3}\tag{7c} $$ Now we simply need to plug $(5)$, $(6)$, and $(7)$ into $(3)$ to get a closed form for the solution.


A Simple Closed Form

Note that $|c_2|=|c_3|\approx0.22968031\lt\frac14$. Since $r_1\approx1.46557123\gt1$, and $r_1r_2r_3=1$, we have that $|r_2|=|r_3|\lt1$. Thus, since $\left|c_2r_2^n+c_3r_3^n\right|\lt\frac12$, according to $(3)$, $a_n$ is the closest integer to $c_1r_1^n$: $$ \begin{array}{r|r|l} n&a_n&c_1r_1^n\\\hline 0&1&0.61149199\\ 1&1&0.89618507\\ 2&1&1.31342306\\ 3&2&1.92491505\\ 4&3&2.82110012\\ 5&4&4.13452318\\ 6&6&6.05943824\\ 7&9&8.88053836\\ 8&13&13.0150615\\ \end{array} $$ Therefore, a simple closed form would be $$ a_n=\left\lfloor c_1r_1^n+\tfrac12\right\rfloor\tag8 $$ where, computed from $(5)$, $$ r_1\approx1.4655712318767680267\tag{9a} $$ and, computed from $\text{(7a)}$, $$ c_1\approx0.61149199195081251841\tag{9b} $$

robjohn
  • 345,667