Background
This question is inspired by this 538 "Riddler Classic" puzzle, and the following puzzle explanation below is copied from there:
You have four standard dice, and your goal is simple: Maximize the sum of your rolls. So you roll all four dice at once, hoping to achieve a high score.
But wait, there’s more! If you’re not happy with your roll, you can choose to reroll zero, one, two or three of the dice. In other words, you must “freeze” one or more dice and set them aside, never to be rerolled.
You repeat this process with the remaining dice — you roll them all and then freeze at least one. You repeat this process until all the dice are frozen.
If you play strategically, what score can you expect to achieve on average?
Extra credit: Instead of four dice, what if you start with five dice? What if you start with six dice? What if you start with N dice?
Question
We are interested only in the general $n$ case, and we are interested in a question tangential to the puzzle's solution.
Assuming perfect play, consider the expected value (EV) of your sum when starting with $n$ dice, which we'll denote $E_n$.
The question is: Is it possible that, for some $n$, the following holds?
$$E_{n+1} > E_n + 6$$
Alternatively, should you ever choose to re-roll a six when playing optimally?
Intuitively, it seems like the answer to both of these equivalent questions should be "no". But I cannot think of a rigorous argument to prove it.