4

Does the algebraic closure of the field $\mathbb{Q}_p$ of $p$-adic numbers exist in ZF without the axiom of choice? If so, how to prove it?

I know that algebraic closures of countable fields can be constructed without the axiom of choice and that it is the uncountable case where choice-free proofs could be a problem. But what about the specific example of $\mathbb{Q}_p$?

russoo
  • 2,405
  • 12
  • 27
  • One algebraic closure, not the algebraic closure, as it's not unique up to unique isomorphism. 2) The field of $p$-adic number has the same cardinal as the field of real numbers.
  • – Olórin Jul 15 '21 at 21:10
  • @Olórin, Isn't the algebraic closure unique up to isomorphism if it exists? – russoo Jul 15 '21 at 21:29
  • What? I mean unique up to isomorphism. – russoo Jul 15 '21 at 21:37
  • 2
    @russoo I wrote that an algebraic closure is not unique up to unique isomorphism (damned automorphisms). Hence one says an albegraic closure and not the algebraic closure. You wouldn't say "the real vector space of dimension 4", wouldn't you ? – Olórin Jul 15 '21 at 21:45
  • @Olórin, ok. Get what you mean. :) It is just that I learned from class and a lot of textbooks that it is unique up to isomorphism and that a lot (or at least some) people use a "sloppy" language and talk about "the" algebraic closure in the context of field extensions of a fixed field. – russoo Jul 15 '21 at 21:50
  • Also related: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/114978/algebraic-closure-for-mathbbq-or-mathbbf-p-without-choice (and also related, the paper I hope to finish over the weekend and update on arXiv next week). – Asaf Karagila Jul 15 '21 at 22:25
  • 4
    @russoo: Without the axiom of choice, algebraic closures are not even unique up to isomorphism. – Eric Wofsey Jul 15 '21 at 23:12
  • @EricWofsey, oh no! Thanks for the comment. Didn't know that. – russoo Jul 15 '21 at 23:15