I know there exist functions like this one for simplifying tetration based sums. There may be a way to simplify this type of sum at least using a lesser known and widely accepted functions. Here are some results as proof: graphical visualization of results and calculation of special case and integral version of special case.
It was a nice idea to find the sophomore’s dream, but I thought that it would be more interesting if I could find a “generalized exponential sophomore’s dream”. This post uses the following functions: regularized gamma functions, the exponential integral function, and tetration. There was an annoying discontinuity at n=0 hence the constant term:
$$\mathrm{\int_0^b \, ^2\left(a^t\right) \, dt=\int_0^b a^{ta^t} \, dt = b + \sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{\ln^n(a)}{n!}\int_0^b t^n a^{tn} \, dt = \boxed{\mathrm{b+\frac1{\ln(a)}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac{(-1)^nP\big(n+1,-n\,b\ln(a)\big)}{n^{n+1}}}}\implies \int_{-\frac1e}^0 e^{{te}^t} \, dt = 1+\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(-1)^nP(n+1,n)}{n^{n+1}}=0.77215…}$$
$$\mathrm{\implies A(a,t)\mathop=^\text{def}\int \,^2\left(a^t\right)dt=C+t+\frac1{ln(a)}\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n Q(n+1,-nt\,ln(a))}{n^{n+1}}=\quad C+t-t\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(t\,ln(a))^n E_{-n}(-nt\,ln(a))}{n!}}$$
This series reminds me of the Marcum Q function for non negative integers: $$\mathrm{Q_m(a,b)=1-e^{-\frac{a^2}2}\sum_{n=0}^\infty\left(\frac{a^2}{2}\right)^n\frac{P\left(m+n,\frac{b^2}2\right)}{n!}}$$
This representation is good, but is quite tedious to use as the formula requires summing an infinite amount of regularized gamma functions. I would like to find a way to get rid of the summation .I see the gamma function with powers which reminds me of the summation definition of a hypergeometric function. I would even like to see the use of a generalized hypergeometric function like Meijer G or Kampé de Fériet functions seen in the link. Please correct me and give me feedback!
\left(x\right)
rather than just(x)
. Using\left
and\right
is needed to make(
and)
grow to the size of the things they enclose, but has no effect when onlyx
is enclosed. – Michael Hardy Aug 01 '21 at 18:05