There should be infinitely many primes of the form $5+6n$. How do you prove it? The same should be true for $7+6n$.
-
3related. – TMM May 31 '13 at 00:24
2 Answers
Primes of the form $6n+5$ is particularly easy:
Suppose that there are finitely many primes of the form $6n+5$, namely $p_1,\cdots, p_n$.
Consider $p^*=6p_1\cdots p_n -1$.
Note that any odd prime other than 3, is of the form $6n+1$ or $6n+5$.
Thus, prime divisors of $p^*$ are either of the form $6n+1$ or $6n+5$.
The prime divisors of $p^*$ should have at least one prime divisor of the form $6n+5$.
This is a contradiction.
For primes of the form $6n+1$, use the following:
"Existence of $x$ in $x^2-x+1\equiv 0\textrm{ mod }p$ $\Longleftrightarrow$ $p$ is of the form $6n+1$."
Suppose there are only finitely many $6n+1$ primes, namely $p_1,\cdots, p_n$,
Then consider $p^*=(p_1\cdots p_n)^2-(p_1\cdots p_n) + 1$.
Prime divisor of $p^*$ should be of the form $6n+1$ according to the above equivalence.
This is a contradiction.

- 20,102
-
2
-
Please be a little more specific as to what p* is?? The equation is not clear. p* =???? – Jun 29 '21 at 04:37
If we cross out from sequence of positive integers all numbers divisible by 2 and all numbers divisible by 3, then all remaining numbers will be in one of two forms:
$S1(n)=6n+5=5,11,17,...$ or $S2(n)=6n+7=7,13,19,....n= 0,1,2,3,...$ So all prime numbers also will be in one of these two forms and ratio 0f number of primes in the sequence $S1(n)$ to number of primes in the sequence $S2(n)$ tends to be $1$.

- 107
-
see [link] (http://www.planet-source-code.com/vb/scripts/ShowCode.asp?txtCodeId=13752&lngWId=3) – Boris Sklyar Mar 20 '19 at 16:54
-
see [link]:(https://www.academia.edu/13890086/Matrix_sieve_the_easiest_way_to_find_prime_numbers) – Boris Sklyar Nov 29 '21 at 19:42