You're solving a cubic here. While there is a general solution, it's no picnic. For most "elementary" (school-style) problems, you won't be expected to apply the full cubic solution. Instead you'll be expected to apply some combination of Rational Root Theorem, Factor Theorem and Polynomial Long Division (or a shortcut like Synthetic Division) to reduce the degree to a quadratic you can solve with methods you already know. But this requires the cubic to have at least one "nice" rational root, which often (but not always) turns out to be an integer.
Let's proceed on the assumption that this is a problem specifically designed to be solvable at an elementary level.
Rearrange the cubic and make it monic (lead coefficient one):
$t^3 - 15t^2 - 200t + 1250 = 0$
By Rational Root Theorem, any rational root (if it exists) will need to divide $1250$. You'll have to consider both positive and negative possibilities for each number.
$1250 = (2^1)(5^4)$
This means it has a total of $(1+1)(4+1)= 10$ factors, considering only the positive ones. Double this for the negatives, and you're looking at $20$.
At this point, you're going to have to "appeal" to the good sense of the question setter and hope the root you're looking for is within that narrow range they stipulated. Which means you'll start by testing $1, 2, 5, 10$. You don't even need to get to the end of that list because you'll hit paydirt at $5$.
Once you know $t=5$ is a root, you can immediately deduce that $(t-5)$ is a factor of the cubic polynomial (this is Factor Theorem). You can then divide the cubic by $(t-5)$ and get a quadratic you can easily solve by any method you've learned (factorisation by inspection, completing the square or quadratic formula).
The division can be simplified by Ruffini's method of synthetic division. The quadratic you get as the result will be $t^2 - 10t - 250$, for which the roots (by formula) are $5(1 \pm \sqrt{11})$. Neither of these values is in the required range, so you can reject them after finding them. But finding them is a must, for rigour.
Now, what would've happened if, in the original application of Rational Root Theorem, you couldn't find a root among the candidates $1,2,5,10$? Technically you have a few choices. You can go on to test the remaining $20-4 = 16$ possibilities. It is possible you'll get a nice rational root outside the stipulated range that, after polynomial division, gets you to a quadratic which does have one or two root(s) in the stipulated range. But that would have to be a pretty sadistic question setter. Not impossible, just unpleasant.
But it's still a more pleasant undertaking than actually solving the cubic using the general solution, which I won't be going into. It's far too tedious and involved.
Anyway, the only solution for your question in the required range is $t=5$.