3

Reading the proof of exponential derivatives I understand this:

To show that $(2^x)'=\ln 2 \cdot 2^x$ in the proof is used the limit:

$$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{2^x-1}{x}$$

My question is: ¿How do I prove that this limit exist?

I don't care about its value. If I were going to prove that this limit is equal to $\ln 2$, I would need the number $e$, and again, this number is defined as the number $a$ such that:

$$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{a^x-1}{x} = 1$$

In another words if I know that for some constant value $a$ the limit:

$$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{a^x-1}{x} $$

exists, let's say it's a number $L$ then I could find all the limits like these in function of $L$, But what makes obvious that this limit exist?

  • I'd argue that in some sense, it isn't obvious that the limit exists. It requires proof. If you have L'Hopital's rule and basic properties of the exponential function that is one way to do it. If you have a power series definition of $e^x$ and facts about power series that is another way. If you don't have these things (and just have the definition of real exponentiation $a^b$ in terms of suprema of some set, or something similar) you may have to do some fiddling with inequalities (which may be equivalent to establishing properties of the exponential function $e^x$ or the number $e$). – leslie townes Feb 21 '21 at 16:08
  • 2
    Before proving the limit, you need to know what definition of $2^x$ you use.// What book are you reading? –  Feb 21 '21 at 16:09
  • Thanks for the ideas. I'm learning by 3Blue1Brown Videos (very nice) and a calculus book called Stewart. ¿Could you suggest me a book? – user232560 Feb 21 '21 at 16:12
  • @user232560: which version of Stewart? Early transcendentals? –  Feb 21 '21 at 16:16
  • Yes, that ..... – user232560 Feb 21 '21 at 16:19
  • 1
    @user232560: the way Stewart proves the derivative of $b^x$ is via the chain rule and several other statements. Where are you exactly "Reading the proof of exponential derivatives"? In the book or somewhere else? –  Feb 21 '21 at 16:23
  • 1
    I disagree with the closing of this question. The question asked it not even similar to the one in the suggested duplicate. – Adam Rubinson Feb 21 '21 at 16:33
  • Thanks mrsamy. Also note to users who agree with me: you can also vote to reopen this question (it is one of the options at the bottom of the question). – Adam Rubinson Feb 21 '21 at 16:40
  • @AdamRubinson: The question in the linked duplicate is different, but the top answer there answers this question along the way. – Eric Wofsey Feb 21 '21 at 21:19
  • @AdamRubinson: this (existence of limit of $(a^x-1)/x$ and $e$ being unique value of $a$ for which the limit is $1$) has been discussed many times here. No point of reopening. – Paramanand Singh Feb 22 '21 at 14:01
  • @AdamRubinson: see this answer for example. – Paramanand Singh Feb 22 '21 at 14:07
  • " $e$ is defined as the number $a$ such that:

    $$\lim_{x \to 0} \frac{a^x-1}{x} = 1.$$" That's interesting. How was it proven in your book that such a number exists?

    – Adam Rubinson Mar 03 '21 at 15:23

2 Answers2

0

Let $a>0$ and $a\ne1$. We want to prove the existence of $\displaystyle \lim_{h\to0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}$.

Assume that $r>1$ and let $f(x)=x^r-rx+r-1$ for $x>0$. Then

$$f'(x)=r(x^{r-1}-1)\begin{cases}<0 &\text{if }0<x<1\\ =0 &\text{if }x=1\\ >0 &\text{if }x>1 \end{cases}$$

Therefore, $f$ attains its absolute minimum at $x=1$. So for all $x>0$, we have

$$f(x)\ge f(1)=0$$

$$x^r\ge rx+1-r$$

So when $r>1$ and $h>0$, $\displaystyle\frac{a^{rh}-1}{rh}\ge\frac{ra^h+1-r-1}{rh}$ and hence

\begin{align} \frac{a^{rh}-1}{rh}-\frac{a^h-1}{h}\ge0 \end{align}

When $r>1$ and $h<0$, $\displaystyle\frac{a^{rh}-1}{rh}\le\frac{ra^h+1-r-1}{rh}$ and hence

\begin{align} \frac{a^{rh}-1}{rh}-\frac{a^h-1}{h}\le0 \end{align}

Therefore, $\displaystyle \frac{a^h-1}{h}$ is an increasing function in $h$. As it is bounded below by $0$ on $(0,\infty)$, $\displaystyle \lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{a^h-1}{h}$ exists.

When $h<0$,

$$\frac{a^h-1}{h}=a^h\left(\frac{a^{-h}-1}{-h}\right)$$

As $\displaystyle \lim_{h\to0^-}a^h$ exists and equals $1$, $\displaystyle \lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{a^h-1}{h}$ exists and $\displaystyle \lim_{h\to0^-}\frac{a^h-1}{h}= \lim_{h\to0^+}\frac{a^h-1}{h}$.

Therefore, $\displaystyle \lim_{h\to0}\frac{a^h-1}{h}$ exists.

Source: How does one prove that $e$ exists?

vitamin d
  • 5,783
-2

$${{2^x-1}\over x}={{e^{xln(2)}-1\over x}}$$

$$\ln(2){{e^{x\ln(2)}-1\over {\ln(2)x}}}$$

Use the variable change $u=\ln(2)x$.

user577215664
  • 40,625