0

Let $X_1,X_2,...,X_n$ be a random sample from the density. $f(x;\theta)=\dfrac{1}{2}e^{|x-\theta|},-\infty<\theta<\infty$.

Discuss the sufficiency and MlE of $\theta$ for this density

I can write this density function as

$ f(x;\theta) = \begin{cases} \dfrac{1}{2}e^{-(x-\theta)} , \theta < x < \infty \\ \dfrac{1}{2}e^{(x-\theta)} , -\infty < x < \theta \end{cases}$

I am skipping the whole proof as I am preparing for time based exam. I just want to know for the first part,we have $\theta<x_{(1)}$ and for second part $\theta>x_{(n)}$

So $x_{(1)}$ and $x_{(n)}$ are jointly sufficient. Am I right ?
and for MLE $\theta$ satisfies $ x_{(n)}<\theta<x_{(1)}$ which seems absurd. Mle doesnt exist in this case?

Daman
  • 2,138

1 Answers1

0

To find MLE for $\theta$ an easy approach is the usual one

$$L(\theta)\propto e^{-\Sigma_i |X_i-\theta|}$$

$$l(\theta)=-\Sigma_i |X_i-\theta|$$

To be maximized...

Maximizing $-\Sigma_i |X_i-\theta|$ is the same as minimizing

$$ \bbox[5px,border:2px solid black] { \Sigma_i |X_i-\theta| \qquad (1) } $$

It is well known that $\hat{\theta}$ which minimize (1) is the sample median

(the proof is easy and I can show it to you if necessary)

tommik
  • 32,733
  • 4
  • 15
  • 34
  • MLE I understood.Please tell me about the sufficiency of this density. – Daman Jan 17 '21 at 11:57
  • Tommik help me please ? – Daman Jan 17 '21 at 13:21
  • @Daman: as already said, order statistics are sufficient estimator for $\theta$. There is the same exercise on Casella Berger, Chapter 6, Exercise 6.9. Here you can find all the solutions http://www.ams.sunysb.edu/~zhu/ams570/Solutions-Casella-Berger.pdf – tommik Jan 17 '21 at 16:18
  • Thanks alot tommik – Daman Jan 17 '21 at 17:01
  • Tommik I don't wanna post this is as a new question since it's a small one can you check if it's TRUE or FALSE. It's false I think they haven't subtracted intersection. I have an exam so that's why I am asking informally please help me.Here – Daman Feb 07 '21 at 07:29
  • @Daman : it's TRUE. The requested probability is $P(X<4)=1-e^{-4}$. If you want you can do as you think but the result is the same: $P(X<3)+P(2<X<4)-P(2<X<3)=1-e^{-3}+e^{-2}-e^{-4}-(e^{-2}-e^{-3})=1-e^{-4}$ – tommik Feb 07 '21 at 07:40
  • Thanks actually I computed $F(0)$ as $1$ thats why I got wrong answer but $F(0)=0$ – Daman Feb 07 '21 at 07:43