There are several similar questions on math.SE, but I couldn't find a resolution of this specific case. I apologize if it turns out this is duplicate.
I'm trying to prove the following property concerning quotient maps: the restriction of a quotient map to a saturated open or closed subset is a quotient map.
Here is my attempt for the case where the restricted domain is open.
Let $X,Y$ be topological spaces, $A$ be a saturated open subset of $X$, and $p:X \to Y$ be a quotient map. Define $q:A \to p(A)$ by $q = p|_A$. We prove that $q$ maps saturated open subsets to open subsets. Let $U \subset A$ be saturated w.r.t. $q$ and open in $A$. We prove it's saturated w.r.t. $p$ and open in $X$. If it weren't saturated, there would be some point in $p^{-1}(p(U))$ which does not lie in $U$. It must be contained in either $A$ or the complement of $A$ in $X$. It cannot lie in $A$, because $U$ is saturated w.r.t. $q$, which agrees with $p$ on $A$. And it cannot lie outside of $A$, because $A$ itself is saturated w.r.t. $p$, and our point is in $U \subset A$. So it must be in $U$. And $U$ is open by definition of the subspace topology, since $A$ is open. So $p$ takes $U$ to an open set in $Y$, and by definition of the subspace topology, $p(U) \cap p(A) = p(U)$ is open in $p(A)$. So $q$ is a quotient map.
But this finagling with the definition of the subspace topology doesn't work as nicely when $A$ is closed instead. Can anyone give me some pointers?
And my other question is: can anyone give a good counterexample for when $A$ is saturated but neither open nor closed?