I'm trying to prove urns version of Laplace's law of succession my professor suggested. Laplace's law states that the chance that the next trial is a success given $j$ successes out of the first $n$ is $\frac{(j+1)}{(n+2)}$. Here is how the problem states:
"If we have $n+k+1$ urns and urn $i$ has $i$ balls labeled $1$ and $n+k-i$ labeled zero. We pick an urn at random and draw $n$ balls from it without replacement say $j$ of them are ones. Show that the conclusion of Laplace's law holds for this setup. In other word, the chance that the next ball is a one is $\frac{(j+1)}{(n+2)}$."
I've proved one version of the law, which close to this version An elementary version of Laplace's Method of Succession. I tried to use similar approach but somehow my answer always in form of $k$ and I can't get rid of it. What is the intuition behind this $k$? Is it just to increase the complexity of the problem, or it has some meaning behind it?