1

I wrote a proof by contradiction for the existence of a prime decomposition for all positive integers, I came up with it while I was trying solidify my understanding of the theorem itself. (Just existence, not uniqueness). If you are reading this and are interested, would you check for any errors? Thank you for reading!

-Proof-

Take $z\geq2\in\mathbb{Z}$ where z is not prime.

Then $$ \exists\;a_{01},a_{02}\geq2\;s.t.\;a_{01}a_{02}=z$$

If both factors are prime, than we are done.

If not, then $$\exists\;a_{11},a_{12}\geq2\;s.t. a_{11}a_{12}=a_{0i_{0}}$$ where $i_{0}=1$ or $2$

If $a_{11},a_{12}$ prime, we are done.

If one is not, then $$ \exists a_{21}a_{22}\geq2\; s.t.\; a_{21}a_{22}=a_{1i_{1}}\; where\; i_{1}=1 \;or\; 2 $$

The process continues ad infinitum $\iff \nexists $ a factorization into primes for z

Suppose this process would continue ad infinitum.

Where $ j_{n}=1 \;or\; 2 \;and\; j_{n}\neq i_{n} $

$$z>a_{0j_{0}}\cdot a_{1j_{1}}\cdot a_{2j_{2}}\cdot....=\prod_{n\geq0}^{\infty}a_{nj_{n}} $$

But $$a_{nj_{n}}\geq2\; \forall\;n$$

Thus $$ z>\infty \;and\; z=\infty $$

But we took z finite thus this process must stop at some point, and thus $\exists$ prime factorization for all positive integers

diracsum
  • 311

1 Answers1

1

You implicitly imply induction (that there is no infinite descending chain of naturals). This must be made explicit for the proof to be rigorous. Below is a way to do so that highlights innate structure.

${\small {\bf Lemma}}\,\ \Bbb N_{>1} =$ only set $S$ of naturals $>\! 1$ containing $\rm\color{#c00}{all\ primes}$ & $\rm\color{#0a0}{closed\, under\, multiplication}$

Proof $\,\ $ If $\,n\,$ is $\rm\color{#c00}{ prime}$ then by hypothesis $\,n\in S.\,$ Else $\,n\,$ is composite, $ $ so $\ n = j k\ $ for $\, 1 < j,k < n.\,$ By strong induction the smaller $\ j,k\in S,\,$ $\rm\color{#0a0}{hence}$ $\, n = jk\in S.$

Corollary $ $ Every natural $>1$ has a prime factorization.

Proof $ $ The set $S$ of naturals $>1$ having prime factorizations contains $\rm\color{#c00}{all\ primes}$ (each is a singleton product) and is $\rm\color{#0a0}{closed\ under\ multiplication},\,$ so the lemma yields $\,S = \Bbb N_{> 1}$.

Bill Dubuque
  • 272,048