There are various questions in this topic, but none were covering my particular question. Can you please help me with the following: I have a Universal Conditional Statement (Universal Implication). Please note that it is NOT a simple straight forward Conditional (Implication) Statement. It has a UNIVERSAL QUANTIFIER:
$\forall , , \in \Bbb Z$, $(−)$ $(−)$ ℎ $(−)$ .
Now I am looking to find the negation of the "Universal Conditional Statement. If I rewrite the question:
Originally, we have:
$P(x) = (−)$ $(−)$ = $R(x) \wedge S(x)$
$R(x) = (−)$
$S(x) = (−)$
$Q(x) = (−)$
which is
$\forall , , \in \Bbb Z$, $P(x)$ ℎ $Q(x)$
or in another word:
$\forall , , \in \Bbb Z$, $R(x) \wedge S(x)$ ℎ $Q(x)$
Will the negation of the above 'Universal Conditional Statement' be:
$\exists , , \in \Bbb Z$, $P(x)$ ℎ $Q(x)$
$\exists , , \in \Bbb Z$, $(−)$ $(−)$ ℎ $(−)$ not e.
This is as per page $111$ of Discrete Mathematics from Susan Epp $4$th edition (or page $125$ of the same book $5$th edition)
or will it be:
$\exists , , \in \Bbb Z, P(x)$ and $\neg Q(x)$?
$\exists , , \in \Bbb Z, (−)$ $(−)$ and $(−)$ not e.