That formula is a generalisation of the power rule, and not valid for $n<0$. Try the full integral definition for the RL derivative:
$$_a^{RL}D_t^n = \frac{d^p}{dt^p}\left(\frac{1}{\Gamma(m)}\int^t_a(t-x)^{m-1}f(x)dx\right)$$
Where $n$ is the fractional order of differentiation ($n\in\mathbb{R}_+$) and $f(x)$ is our integrand;
$p\in\mathbb{N}:={p=ānā}$, $m\in\mathbb{R}:=m=1-n$
Function outputted in terms of t, $a$ and $t$ are our integration bounds.
You will find with these defined methods of finding fractional derivatives that differentiation order sums, and the "double half-derivative" will be zero for a constant.
The RL half derivative of a constant $c$ is therefore:
$$_0^{RL}D_t^{0.5}c = \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{\Gamma(0.5)}\int^t_0(t-x)^{0.5-1}(c)dx\right)$$
$$= \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{c}{\sqrt\pi}\int^t_0(t-x)^{-0.5}dx\right)$$
$$= \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{c}{\sqrt\pi}\left[\frac{2x-2t}{\sqrt{t-x}}\right]^t_0\right)$$
$$= \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{2ct}{\sqrt{\pi{t}}}\right)=\frac{c}{\sqrt{\pi{t}}}$$
As you identified with the generalised power rule method, which worked as the differentiation order was 0. You can do this computation again on the answer, this time with the valid RL method:
$$_0^{RL}D_t^{0.5}\frac{c}{\sqrt{\pi{x}}} = \frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{1}{\Gamma(0.5)}\int^t_0(t-x)^{0.5-1}(\frac{c}{\sqrt{\pi{t}}})dx\right)$$
$$=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{c}{\sqrt{\pi}}\int^t_0\frac{1}{\sqrt{{\pi}xt-x^2{\pi}}}dx \right)$$
$$=\frac{d}{dt}\left(\frac{c}{\sqrt{\pi}}\left[\frac{2\left(\sqrt{tx(1-\frac{x}{t})}\right)arcsin\left(\frac{\sqrt{x}}{\sqrt{t}}\right)}{\sqrt{{\pi}tx-{\pi}x^2}}\right]^t_0 \right)$$
Which looks like a horrible equation, but all goes to zero when we input the limits due to the numerator.
Additionally, be careful with different definitions of the fractional differintegral, as many of them interact differently. For example, if you choose to look into the Caputo definition for the fractional differintegral, you will find any fractional derivative of a constant will be zero; with the Riemann-Liouville definition there will be a value.