I have the following theorem to prove by induction:
$$ F_{n} \cdot F_{n+1} - F_{n-2}\cdot F_{n-1}=F_{2n-1} $$
It is mentioned in my script that the proof should be possible only by using the recursion of Fibonacci numbers:$$F_{n+1}=F_{n}+F_{n-1}$$
I was only able to proof this theorem by using other theorems, as I was not able to proof it without knowing an relationship between $F_{n }$ and $F_{2n}$. The thing is: I know that the theorem is true, and I have 2 different proofs for it, but I am searching for an elegant proof without using other knowledge apart from the recursion.
Induction hypothesis: $$ F_{n} \cdot F_{n+1} - F_{n-2}\cdot F_{n-1}=F_{2n-1} $$ We want to show the following is also true:
$$ F_{n+1} \cdot F_{n+2} - F_{n-1}\cdot F_{n}=F_{2n+1} $$
So we transform the induction hypothesis by adding $F_{n+1}^2-F_{n-1}^2$:
$$ F_{n} \cdot F_{n+1} +F_{n+1}^2 - F_{n-2}\cdot F_{n-1} -F_{n-1}^2 = F_{n+1} \cdot F_{n+2} - F_{n-1}\cdot F_{n}=F_{2n-1} + F_{n+1}^2-F_{n-1}^2$$
So we have the LHS of what we want to show. We would need to show that $F_{n+1}^2-F_{n-1}^2=F_{2n}$ and our proof would be finished. I was not able to proof this, I tried it with another induction.
Another idea was to use two induction hypothesis: $$ (1) F_{n-1} \cdot F_{n} - F_{n-3}\cdot F_{n-2}=F_{2n-3} $$ $$ (2) F_{n} \cdot F_{n+1} - F_{n-2}\cdot F_{n-1}=F_{2n-1} $$
and then $(2)-(1)= F_{n-2}$ would give us: $$ F_{2n-2}= F_{n}^2-F_{n-2}^2$$ This looks more promising, considering our problem in the last attempt. By adding (2) we get: $$ F_{2n}= F_{n} \cdot F_{n+2} - F_{n-2}\cdot F_{n}$$ By adding (2) again we would get: $$ F_{2n+1}= F_{n} \cdot F_{n+3} - F_{n-2}\cdot F_{n+1}$$ Now one would need to show this is equivalent, to what we want to prove. Again I was not successful trying to do this.
I would be very glad if someone could show me an complete induction proof not requiring other theorems. I know this theorem is only a special case of the following: $$ F_{n+m} = F_{nā1}\cdot F_{m} + F_{n}\cdot F_{m+1}$$, which in fact is easy to show with induction. But I only know this theorem from googeling and I don't think it is necessary to do an induction proof of my special case of the theorem only by assuming the general case.
I hope someone would like to help me!