One definition of $e$ that I am fond of is that it is the number $a$ such that $$ \lim_{h\to 0}\frac{a^{h} -1}{h}=1 $$ The reason for this is that it cuts to the heart of the special property of all exponential functions. If we have $f(x)=a^x$, then \begin{align} f'(x)&=\lim_{\Delta x \to 0}\frac{a^{x+\Delta x} -a^x}{\Delta x} \\ &=\lim_{\Delta x \to 0}a^x\frac{a^{\Delta x} - 1}{\Delta x} \\ &=a^x\lim_{\Delta x \to 0}\frac{a^{\Delta x} - 1}{\Delta x} \end{align} However, presumably there is a caveat to this approach. We need to show that a number like $e$ exists in the first place! In other words, we need to show that $g(a)=\lim_{\Delta x \to 0}\frac{a^{\Delta x} -1}{\Delta x}$ takes the value of $1$ for some value of $a$. How might we do this?
3 Answers
Independently, we can prove that there exists a number $e$ such that $e = \lim_{n \to \infty} (1+1/n)^n$ along with the property that for all $n \in \mathbb{N}$,
$$\left(1 + \frac{1}{n} \right)^n < e < \left(1 + \frac{1}{n} \right)^{n+1}$$
It follows that
$$1 < n(e^{1/n}-1) < n\left[\left(1 + \frac{1}{n} \right)^{1/n}\left( 1+ \frac{1}{n}\right)-1 \right] \leqslant 1 + \frac{1}{n} + \frac{1}{n^2},$$
where the right-hand inequality is obtained using Bernoulli's inequality $(1 + 1/n)^{1/n} \leqslant 1 + 1/n^2$.
By the squeeze theorem we get
$$\tag{*}\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{e^{1/n}-1}{\frac{1}{n}} = 1$$
From here it is not difficult to show that
$$\tag{**} \lim_{h \to 0+}\frac{e^{h}-1}{h} = 1$$
Taking $n = \lfloor1/h\rfloor$ when $h > 0$, we have $n \leqslant 1/h < n+1$ and
$$\frac{n}{n+1}(n+1)(e^{1/n+1} - 1)= n(e^{1/n+1} - 1 ) \leqslant \frac{e^h -1 }{h} \leqslant (n+1)(e^{1/n} -1) = \frac{n+1}{n}n(e^{1/n}-1)$$
Since $n \to \infty$ if and only if $h \to 0$ we obtain (**) by the squeeze theorem using the previous result (*).
With some more work we can show that the limit $1$ is also attained as $h \to 0-$.

- 90,707
Let $f(x)$ be given by the
$$f(x)=\int_1^x \frac1t\,dt$$
It is easy to show that $f(x)$ is continuous and increasing for $x>0$ with $f(1)=0$ and $\lim_{x\to\infty}f(x)=\infty$. Then, by the intermediate value theorem, there exists a number $a>1$ such that
$$f(a)=\int_1^a \frac1t\,dt=1\tag1$$
We enforce the substitution $t\mapsto (1+ht)^{1/h}$ in $(1)$ to obtain
$$1=\int_0^{(a^h-1)/h}\frac1{1+ht}\,dt\tag2$$
For $h>0$, $\frac{a^h-1}{h}>0$ and $1\le 1+ht\le a^h$ when $t\in [0,(a^h-1)/h]$. Therefore, from $(2)$ we find that
$$\left(\frac{a^h-1}{h}\right)a^{-h}\le 1\le \left(\frac{a^h-1}{h}\right)\tag3$$
Rearranging $(3)$, we have the bounds
$$1\le \left(\frac{a^h-1}{h}\right)\le a^h$$
whence application of the squeeze theorem yields
$$\lim_{h\to 0^+}\left(\frac{a^h-1}{h}\right)=1$$
We leave it as an exercise for the reader to show that the left-side limit is also $1$ from which we conclude
$$\lim_{h\to 0}\left(\frac{a^h-1}{h}\right)=1$$
for some $a>1$ such that $1=\int_1^a \frac1t\,dt$.

- 179,405
-
1@joe Please let me know how I can improve my answer. I really want to give you the best answer I can. – Mark Viola Sep 01 '20 at 15:38
-
Thanks for contacting me. I'm having trouble understanding how you got from equation $1$ to equation $2$. In particular, I'm not sure how you converted the bounds of the integral, and also how your substitution works. – Joe Sep 01 '20 at 15:44
-
1Hi Joe. You're welcome. My pleasure. In going from $(1)$ to $(2)$, we made the substitution $t= (1+hu)^{1/h}$. Then, $dt= \frac1h \times (1+hu)^{1/h -1}\times h,du=(1+hu)^{1/h-1},du$. Then, $\frac1t ,dt =\frac1{1+hu},du$. The limits of integration transform also. When $t=1$ , $u=0$. And when $t=a$, $u=\frac{a^h-1}{h}$. Finally, $u$ is a dummy variable so after we make the substitution, we can relabel it as $t$. – Mark Viola Sep 01 '20 at 16:07
-
1
-
Yes it did. Sorry for the late reply—I was busy preparing for my return to school. Since this answer seems quite elegant, I am going to accept it. – Joe Sep 03 '20 at 18:12
-
1Hi Joe. Much appreciated. And best of luck in your returning to classes. Stay safe and healthy! – Mark Viola Sep 03 '20 at 18:13
Let me suggest one more, if it can be so called, functional, approach. Let's consider function $f$ with following 3 property:
- $f(x_1+x_2)=f(x_1)f(x_2)$ for $\forall x_1,x_2 \in \mathbb{R}$
- $f(0)=1,f(1)=a$ where $a>0$
- $f$ is continuous in $x=0$
It can be proved, that exists unique continuous on all $\mathbb{R}$ function, which satisfies brought properties and it we define as $a^x$.
Can be proved, that exists limit $$\lim\limits_{x \to \infty}\left( 1+\frac{1}{x} \right)^x= \lim\limits_{x \to 0}\left( 1+ x\right)^{\frac{1}{x}}$$ and we denote it by $e$. For $e$, at last, we obtain $$\lim\limits_{x \to 0}\frac{e^x-1}{x}=1$$ If this approach is satisfactory and you are interested in the details, then write which part you would like to see more fully written.

- 13,410
How would you even define $a^x$ without the exponential function in the first place?
– Xileflix Aug 31 '20 at 22:05