What would be an equation that I can use when I compute the eigenpairs for the coefficient matrix $A.$
-
$AX=\lambda X$? – Julien May 03 '13 at 03:52
-
Would I need to find the det of A – user1988 May 03 '13 at 03:55
-
oh is that where I would subtract the lambda from a and d? – user1988 May 03 '13 at 03:59
-
If you're talking about $2\times 2$ matrices with $a,d$ on the diagonal, yes. – Julien May 03 '13 at 04:01
-
Yes, I should have been more specific. Thank you! – user1988 May 03 '13 at 04:02
-
To take @julien's answer one step further, note that $AX=\lambda X$ is equivalent to $AX - \lambda X = 0$, which simplifies to $(A-\lambda I)X = 0$, which requires $det(A-\lambda I)=0$ if you want $X \neq 0$... – gt6989b May 03 '13 at 04:08
2 Answers
Here is the fundamental idea for solving a system of linear ode's with constant coefficients.
To solve the system $Y'(t)=AY(t)$, assuming for simplicity $A_{2\times 2}$ matrix, we assume the solution to have the form
$$ Y(t) = \begin{bmatrix} k_1 \\ k_2 \end{bmatrix}\rm e^{\lambda t} \implies Y'(t) = \begin{bmatrix} k_1 \\ k_2 \end{bmatrix}\lambda \rm e^{\lambda t}. $$
Now, we substitute back in the Diff. eq. which gives
$$ Y'(t) = \begin{bmatrix} k_1 \\ k_2 \end{bmatrix}\lambda \rm e^{\lambda t} = A \begin{bmatrix} k_1 \\ k_2 \end{bmatrix}\rm e^{\lambda t}\implies \begin{bmatrix} \lambda k_1 \\ \lambda k_2 \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix} a & b \\ c & d \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix} k_1 \\ k_2 \end{bmatrix}. $$
Solve the last system for $k_1$ and $k_2$. In order to get a non trivial solution for the system we force the determinant of the matrix of the coefficients to be zero which results in getting $\lambda's$ the eigenvalues.

- 47,431
In the two dimensional case, the eigenvalues of the matrix $A=\begin{pmatrix}a& b\\ c& d\end{pmatrix}$ are the roots of the characteristic polynomial $$ \chi_A(\lambda)=\lambda^2-\mathrm{tr}(A)\lambda+\det(A), $$ where $$ \mathrm{tr}(A)=a+d,\qquad\det(A)=ad-bc. $$ Let me assume you know how to compute these roots. To compute an eigenvector $u_\lambda=\begin{pmatrix}x_\lambda\\ y_\lambda\end{pmatrix}$ for the eigenvalue $\lambda$, note that $Au_\lambda=\lambda u_\lambda$ if and only if $$ by_\lambda=(\lambda-a)x_\lambda,\qquad cx_\lambda=(\lambda-d)y_\lambda, $$ and that these two equations are actually equivalent (this is the sign that $\lambda$ is indeed an eigenvalue), hence a first choice for $u_\lambda$ is $$ u_\lambda=\begin{pmatrix}b\\ \lambda-a\end{pmatrix}. $$ This choice fails if the RHS is the zero vector, that is, if $b=0$ and $\lambda=a$, then choose $$ u_\lambda=\begin{pmatrix}\lambda-d\\ c\end{pmatrix}. $$ The only case when both choices fail is when $A=aI$, then both eigenvalues are $a$ and every nonzero vector is an eigenvector.

- 279,727