I understand there are many questions on here that show give an explicit map to show that $SU(2)$ is a double cover of $SO(3)$ (seevia quaternions).
I am trying and use the fact that $SU(2)$ is a double cover of $SO(3)$ to write $SU(2)$ as some fibre bundle. But I seem to encounter some contradictions. I want to know what is incorrect. Here are my ideas:
(1) Since the Lie algebras of $SO(3)$ and $SU(2)$ are isomorphic. They have isomorphic connected components.
(2) Covering spaces can always be thought of as discrete fibre bundles over the base space.
(3) But $SU(2)$ is simply connected.
I think (2) is wrong.
(4) If two is wrong what is the correct way to think about covering spaces. As far as I understand $SU(2)$ has one connected component, and $SO(3)$ has two connected components. So it seems like maybe $SO(3)$ should be a double cover of $SU(2)$?