I'm going through some properties of normal subgroups. One of them is that if a subgroup $H$ is a union of conjugacy classes of a group $G$, then $H$ is normal in $G$.
I found a couple of proofs for this, one for example on the proof wiki goes roughly like this (summary of my understanding):
- Assume $H$ is the union of the conjugacy class of each $x \in H$. Call this conjugacy class $C_x$.
- Then, for each $x \in H$, $C_x \subseteq H$.
- Then, for each $x \in H$ and for each $g \in G$, $gxg^{-1} \in H$.
- So for each $g \in G$, $gHg^{-1} \subseteq H$.
- This means $H$ is normal in $G$.
At the moment the proof concludes with:
- So for each $g \in G$, $gHg^{-1} \subseteq H$.
Which is equivalent to $gH = Hg$ (as both show a subgroup is normal), but I was wondering if we can find a chain of implications that if $H$ is a union of conjugacy classes, then $gH = Hg$.