0

Consider set $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}] = \{a+b\sqrt{5}i : a,b \in \mathbb{Z} \}$.

My task is to show some features listed below:

  1. Show that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ is a ring.

I would like to show that $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ is a subring of $\mathbb{C}$.

Let $z,w \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ and $z = a + b\sqrt{5}i, w = c+d\sqrt{5}i$, where $a,b,c,d \in \mathbb{Z}$.

It is sufficient to show that

$z+w, -z, zw \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$

$z+w = a+b\sqrt{5}i + c+d\sqrt{5}i = (a+c) + (b+d)\sqrt{5}i \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$

$-z = -(a+b\sqrt{5}i) = (-a) + (-b)\sqrt{5}i \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$

$zw = (a+b\sqrt{5}i)(c+d\sqrt{5}i) = (ac - 5bd) + (ad+bd)\sqrt{5}i \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$

Hence $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ as a subring of ring $\mathbb{C}$ then it is also a ring.

  1. Let $z = 2+\sqrt{5}i$. Show that $z$ is irreducible.

I know the definition of being irreducible, it has to be non invertible and the following has to be true:

$\forall x,y \in \mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$ if $ z = xy \Rightarrow x$ or $y$ has to be invertible.

Hint is to use that fact that norm $\lvert z\rvert = 3$. Hence all divisiors of $z$ have norm lower or equal than $3$.

I do not know how to use this hint.

  1. Show that $z \lvert 3\cdot 3$ and $z$ does not divide $3$.

For the first one I was thinking about

$3 \cdot 3 = 9 = (2+\sqrt{5}i)(2-\sqrt{5}i) \Rightarrow z \lvert 3\cdot 3$

For the second one I was thinking about dividing $3$ by $z$ in $\mathbb{C}$.

Then $$\frac{3}{z} = \frac{3}{2+\sqrt{5}i} = \frac{2}{3} + (\frac{-1}{3})\sqrt{5}i$$ which is not an element of $\mathbb{Z}[\sqrt{-5}]$.

Is this point correct?

  1. Show that $z$ is irreducible element, but not a prime element.

This can be obtained from points 2. and 3.

Since $z\lvert 3\cdot 3$, but $z$ does not divide $3$.

janusz
  • 1,205
  • But is the first part of 3 at least correct? – janusz May 18 '20 at 13:54
  • 1
    Yes, we indeed have have $(2+\sqrt{-5})(2-\sqrt{5})=3\cdot 3$. – Dietrich Burde May 18 '20 at 13:57
  • I have a question about showing that $z$ does not divide $3$. Is it correct to assume that if $z$ divide $3$ then $zw = 3$ for some $w$ in our ring. But the norm argument gives us that $\lvert w \rvert = 1$ hence $zw \neq 3$? – janusz May 18 '20 at 14:32
  • 1
    janusz, everything is well explained here, e.g., at this post. Did you see this? – Dietrich Burde May 18 '20 at 14:36
  • Thank you sir, now everything is clear. – janusz May 18 '20 at 14:46