The fact is that I am not getting the question clear if $a_m=5$ and $a_n=17$ and if I take $m=3$ and $n=7$ .This doesn't hold true.Can someone help me to understand what the question is asking me ?
Asked
Active
Viewed 76 times
1 Answers
0
There is counterexample to your statement. Let us take $$a_n=\begin{cases} n^2,&& \text{if $n$ is prime}\\ n,&& \text{otherwise}\\ \end{cases}$$
If $m$ is prime then $(a_m,a_{m!})=(m^2,m!)=m=(m,m!)$. Otherwise $a_m=m$, and $a_{m!}=m!$, so the statement is evident.

Pavel Kozlov
- 919
$m!=n$
in the title was meant as “not equal”, not as faculty. – Martin R May 15 '20 at 10:59