I am reading this book. In the example 1.1 they said to prove this problem.
probelm
Let $x$ and $y$ be integers. Prove that $2x + 3y$ is divisible by $17$ iff $9x + 5y$ is divisible by $17$
the solution they provided is
$$17 \mid (2x + 3y) \implies 17 \mid [13(2x + 3y)]$$ or $$17 \mid (26x + 39y) \implies 17 \mid (9x + 5y)$$ and conversely,
$$17 \mid (9x + 5y) \implies 17 \mid [4(9x + 5y)]$$ or $$ 17 \mid (36x + 20y) \implies 17 \mid (2x + 3y)$$
I can't understand how the concluded this
$$17 \mid (26x + 39y) \implies 17 \mid (9x + 5y)$$ implication and this
$$17 \mid (36x + 20y) \implies 17 \mid (2x + 3y)$$
the only rule I know is
if $\;a|b\;$ then $\;a|bk$.
where a,b and k are integers. we can't deduce the above two implication (that is I confused) using this rule isn't it? is there any other point to determine that above two implications are true?
$$
. I have edited your answer as an example. – Aryabhata Apr 20 '13 at 05:21