I am confused since the definition of order says that $(ab)^n=e$, therefore does just showing that ab=ba solves both parts or is it two different solutions?
Assume $(ab)^n=e$, following the definition of order since n is a finite number.
$(ab)^n=\underbrace{(ab)(ab)(ab)\cdots(ab)}_{n~\text{copies}}$
$=a\underbrace{(ba)(ba)(ba)\cdots(ba)}_{n-1~\text{copies}}b$
$=a(ba)^{n-1} b$
From this, we get that $(ba)^{n-1}=a^{-1} b^{-1}=(ba)^{-1}$, therefore we have $(ba)^n=e$. Also proving that $ab=ba$.
Would this answer both of the questions above since then it show that both $ba^n=e$ and that the order of $ba$ would be $n$?
Assume (ab)^n=e, following the definition of order since n is a finite number. (ab)^n=(ab)(ab)(ab)………(ab)^(n-1) (ab)^n =a(ba)(ba)(ba)……(ba)b =a(ba)^(n-1) b
– Heath May 05 '20 at 02:23