2

For $P \rightarrow Q$, the truth table looks like this:

  • True P, true Q: true
  • True P, false Q: false
  • False P, true Q: true
  • False P, false Q: true

Since this is the first time for me to study this, I'm trying to understand it using a concrete example. Let's say $P$ is "I kicked the ball" and $Q$ is "the ball moved". Then the truth table above translates to:

  • Does "I kicked the ball" and "the ball moved" support the if-then? Yes.
  • Does "I kicked the ball" and "the ball did not move" support the if-then? No.
  • Does "I didn't kick the ball" and "the ball moved" support the if-then? Well, at least it doesn't contradict it - so yes.
  • Does "I didn't kick the ball" and "the ball did not move" support the if-then? Well, at least it doesn't contradict it - so yes.

Is my understanding correct?

amWhy
  • 209,954

1 Answers1

2

That's precisely how the truth-table defines $p\to q$; your understanding is entirely spot-on with it.

Note that in case three, perhaps a strong gust of wind moved the ball, or a toddler came along, while you were drinking water, and kicked the ball.

The material conditional $p\to q$ is always true unless $p$ is true, but $q$ is false.


Another example some find useful:

Suppose $p$: You carry my groceries to my car.

Suppose $q:$ I pay you $\$5.$

Now we evaluate $p\to q$ as a promise to you: Under which truth value assignments did I lie (false), and which did I not break my promise/didn't lie (true).

If you carried my groceries to the car, and I paid you $\$5$, I haven't lied.

If you didn't carry my groceries to the care, and I paid you $\$5$, I haven't lied. (Perhaps I gave you $\$5$ because you declined my offer politely and explained you were already running late and had to pick up your niece from preschool, and I was impressed by your sense of responsibility.)

If you didn't carry my groceries to the car, and I didn't pay you $\$5$, I haven't lied.

But, if you did carry my groceries to the car, and I didn't pay you $\$5$, then, and only then, I certainly lied.

amWhy
  • 209,954