Have a doubt in exercise that is repeated in two texts (as stated at the end)-
Suppose there are six elements $1,a,b,c,d,e$ whose laws of combination are given by the table. As per the table, there is identity and inverse; with implied closure under the binary operation. Hence, these elements form a group. Such elements can be shown by two examples:
(i) Permutations: $1, (xyz), (xzy), (yz), (xy), (zx)$;
(ii) Substitutions: $f(x)=x,\frac{1}{1-x},\frac{x-1}{x},\frac 1x,\frac{x}{x-1}, 1-x$
Have table copied from the second source, although the first source has different table. $$ \begin{array}{c|lcr} & \text{f1} & \text{f2} & \text{f3} & \text{f4} & \text{f5} & \text{f6}\\ \hline f1 & f1 & f2 & f3 & f4 & f5 & f6\\ f2 & f2 & f1 & f4 & f3 & f6 & f5\\ f3 & f3 & f6 & f1 & f5 & f4 & f2\\ f4 & f4 & f5 & f2 & f6 & f3 & f1\\ f5 & f5 & f4 & f6 & f2 & f1 & f3\\ f6 & f6 & f3 & f5 & f1 & f2 & f4\\ \end{array} $$
Taking the simpler case of (ii) (also, this example is in both sources), have difficulty in understanding all the entries; but let us consider only the diagonal entries; starting from the left hand corner.
Say, how it is possible that $f1*f1 = f1$, i.e. $x*x = x$. Similarly, how $f2*f2 = f1$, i.e. $\frac 1x*\frac 1x = x$. In fact, none seems to fit the table given.
Instead, what seems to lack is that there should be an additional element for identity function = f0 =1.
Only then can have the concept of inverse, else no function ($f1\cdots f6$) can have any inverse.
Also, even after this modification (of adding, Identity element); the property of closure still does not seem to fit, as the multiplication operation will yield new functions outside the set of elements in the group (of six functions), say $f1*f1 = x^2$, and so on.
Further, have questions:
1. Is the identity element assumed to be present implicitly in the abovemultiplication table.
2. Why the multiplication table of two sources differ?
Both exercises are given as exercise in the book by Harold Hilton on Groups. Also, the second example is repeated as an exercise in the book by Emil Artin, titled 'Algebra with Galois Theory'.