2

This is Exercise I.5(b) of Mac Lane and Moerdijk's, "Sheaves in Geometry and Logic [. . .]." According to Approach0, it is new to MSE.

The Details:

From p. 17 ibid. . . .

Definition 1: Given two functors

$$F:\mathbf{X}\to \mathbf{A}\quad G: \mathbf{A}\to \mathbf{X},$$

we say that $G$ is right adjoint to $F$, written $F\dashv G$, when for any $X\in{\rm Ob}(\mathbf{X})$ and any $A\in{\rm Ob}(\mathbf{A})$, there is a natural bijection between morphisms

$$\frac{X\stackrel{f}{\to}G(A)}{F(X)\stackrel{h}{\to}A},$$

in the sense that each $f$, as displayed, uniquely determines $h$, and conversely.

From p. 19 ibid. . . .

Definition 2: Suppose products exist in $\mathbf{C}$. For a fixed $A\in{\rm Ob}(\mathbf{C})$, one may consider the functor

$$A\times -: \mathbf{C}\to \mathbf{C}.$$

If this functor had a right adjoint (unique up to isomorphism), this adjoint is denoted by

$$(-)^A:\mathbf{C}\to \mathbf{C}.$$

In this case $A$ is said to be an exponentiable object of $\mathbf{C}$.

The Question:

For objects $X, Y$ in $\mathbf{Sets}^{G^{{\rm op}}}$, for $G$ a group, show that the exponent $Y^X$ can be described as the set of all functions $f: X\to Y$, with the right action of $g\in G$ on such a function defined by $(fg)x=[f(xg^{-1})]g$ for $x\in X$.

Thoughts:

I've answered Exercise I.5(a) with the help of Goldblatt's, "Topoi: A Categorial Analysis of Logic," since $\S$4.6(Exponentiation) defines exponentiation for left action by a monoid $M$.

Here is Exercise I.5(a):

In $\mathbf{B}M=\mathbf{Sets}^{M^{{\rm op}}}$ for $M$ a monoid observe that an object $X$ is a right action $X\times M\to X$ of $M$ on a set $X$ and that, $Y$ being another object, ${\rm Hom}(X, Y)$ is the set of equivariant maps $e:X\to Y$ [maps with $e(xm)=(ex)m$ for all $x\in X, m\in M$]. Prove that the exponent $Y^X$ is the set ${\rm Hom}(M\times X, Y)$ of equivariant maps $e: M\times X\to Y$, where $M$ is the set $M$ with right action by $M$, with the action $e\mapsto ek$ of $k\in M$ on $e$ defined by $(ek)(g, x)=e(kg, x)$.

Here is $\S$4.6(Exponentiation).

It's not too difficult to translate the description therein of the exponent.

Context:

For a rough idea of my abilities, see this question of mine. I am self-taught in category theory.

I think, given more time, that I should be able to do the exercise. But I've given it a couple of days and have got nowhere. I would like to move on to the next question.

Please help :)

Shaun
  • 44,997

1 Answers1

1

Well you can try to prove that when $M$ is a group, then $\hom_{M-\mathbf{Set}}(M\times X,Y) \cong \hom_\mathbf{Set}(X,Y)$ and that under this isomorphism, the action given in I.5.(a) becomes the action described in the question (b) ?

Consider $$\begin{align} f: M\times X&\to M\times X,\\ (m,x)&\mapsto (m,xm^{-1}). \end{align}$$

Then $$\begin{align} f((m,x)\cdot_{M\times X} n) &= f(mn,xn) \\ &= (mn, xm^{-1}) \\ &= (m,xm^{-1})\cdot_{M\times X^{triv}} n\\ & = f(m,x)\cdot_{M\times X^{triv}} n, \end{align}$$ where $X^{triv}$ is $X$ with the trivial $M$-action.

It follows clearly that $M\times X\cong M\times X^{triv}$ as $M$-sets, so $\hom_{M-\mathbf{Set}}(M\times X,Y) \cong \hom_{M-\mathbf{Set}}(M\times X^{triv},Y) \cong \hom_\mathbf{Set}(X,Y)$ (the last isomorphism is easy to prove, and it's a good exercise)

Now you only have to see what the action on the left you described in (a) becomes on the right. It should be the action described in (b).

Shaun
  • 44,997
Maxime Ramzi
  • 43,598
  • 3
  • 29
  • 104