2

Please look at the following relation.

$$\forall k \in \mathbb{N}, \ \ \ \ \ \sum^k_{n=0}\frac{(k-n)^k(-1)^n}{(k-n)!n!}=1$$

I don't know a proof of this relation.

I tried mathematical induction. But it didn't work.

Blue
  • 75,673
isato
  • 432

1 Answers1

1

We will prove something stronger. Namely, that

$$f_k(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{(k+x-n)^k(-1)^n}{(k-n)!n!}=1$$

for any $x\in\mathbb{R}$. However, first we will provide a lemma that will be used later in the proof. That is that identity

$$\sum_{n=0}^k\binom{k}{n}n^j(-1)^n=0\text{ for }0\leq j<k$$

From here, an explicit formula for Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind is

$$S2(j,k)=\frac{1}{k!}\sum_{n=0}^k(-1)^{k-n}\binom{k}{n}n^j$$

Then

$$\sum_{n=0}^k\binom{k}{n}n^j(-1)^n=k!(-1)^kS2(j,k)$$

However, $S2(j,k)$ is defined as the number of ways to arrange $j$ elements into $k$ non-empty sets. The key here being non-empty. That is, if $j<k$ then it is impossible to arrange the $j$ elements into $k$ non-empty sets so $S2(j,k)=0$. That is, if $j<k$ then

$$\sum_{n=0}^k\binom{k}{n}n^j(-1)^n=0$$

Having proved our lemma, we continue onto the main proof. Now, consider the form of $f_k(x)$. Obviously, $f_k(x)$ is a polynomial. That is, it is an entire function. We are justified then in taking its Maclaurin Series. To this end, we need to calculate $f_k^{(m)}(0)$ for $m\geq 1$. Now, since $f_k(x)$ is of degree at most $k$, $f_k^{(m)}(0)=0$ for $m\geq k+1$. Consider the derivatives of $f_k(x)$:

$$f_k^{(0)}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{(-1)^n (k-n+x)^k}{n! (k-n)!}$$

$$f_k^{(1)}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{k (-1)^n (k-n+x)^{k-1}}{n! (k-n)!}$$

$$f_k^{(2)}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{(k-1) k (-1)^n (k-n+x)^{k-2}}{n! (k-n)!}$$

$$\vdots$$

$$f_k^{(m)}(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{k! (-1)^n (k-n+x)^{k-m}}{n! (k-n)!(k-m)!}$$

for $0\leq m\leq k$. Thus,

$$f_k^{(m)}(0)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{k! (-1)^n (k-n)^{k-m}}{n! (k-n)!(k-m)!}$$

$$=\frac{1}{(k-m)!}\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{k! (-1)^n (k-n)^{k-m}}{n! (k-n)!}$$

Expanding $(k-n)^{k-m}$ in its Binomial Series gives us

$$=\frac{1}{(k-m)!}\sum_{n=0}^k\left[\binom{k}{n} \sum_{j=0}^{k-m}\binom{k-m}{j}k^{k-m-j}n^j(-1)^{n+j}\right]$$

Since these are finite sums, we can switch the order of summation to get

$$=\frac{1}{(k-m)!}\sum_{j=0}^{k-m}\left[ \binom{k-m}{j}k^{k-m-j}(-1)^j\sum_{n=0}^{k}\binom{k}{n}n^j(-1)^{n}\right]$$

But for $m\geq 1$, $j$ will always be less than $k$. This is precisely the lemma we proved above. Thus, for $m\geq 1$

$$=\frac{1}{(k-m)!}\sum_{j=0}^{k-m}\left[ \binom{k-m}{j}k^{k-m-j}(-1)^j\cdot 0\right]=0$$

and hence

$$f_k^{m}(0)=0$$

Since every coefficient in the Maclaurin Series except for the $m=0$ is zero, we conclude $f_k(x)$ is a constant function. That is

$$f_k(x)=a_k$$

where $a_k$ could change depending on $k$. We seek to show that $a_k=1$ for all $k$. In fact, this is easily done as we can simply calculate $f_k(0)$:

$$f_k(0)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{(k-n)^k(-1)^n}{(k-n)!n!}=a_k$$

(this is your original question). In fact, these terms can be rearrange to

$$a_k=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{(k-n)^k(-1)^n}{(k-n)!n!}=\frac{1}{k!}\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{k!(k-n)^k(-1)^n}{(k-n)!n!}$$

$$k!a_k=\sum_{n=0}^k\binom{k}{n}(k-n)^k(-1)^n$$

However, as was pointed out by user @Angela_Richardson, this exact problem can be found here already. In the link provided, simply swap $n$ and $k$, and set $l=k$ to get

$$k!a_k=\sum_{n=0}^k\binom{k}{n}(k-n)^k(-1)^n=k!$$

$$a_k=1$$

Thus, your original question is answered in the affirmative as well as

$$f_k(x)=\sum_{n=0}^k\frac{(k+x-n)^k(-1)^n}{(k-n)!n!}=1$$

for all $x\in\mathbb{R}$.

QC_QAOA
  • 11,796
  • Since this post was made a duplicate of https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/1862571/combinatorial-proof-of-sum-k-0n-1k-binomnkl-kn-n-using-inc I also posted this there with a note explaining why it is there. If I should delete one or the other, then please tell me as I am no longer sure where the appropriate place to leave it is – QC_QAOA Dec 24 '19 at 08:49
  • Thank you so much ! – isato Dec 24 '19 at 09:11
  • Apologies for revisiting an old thread, but I have a question about this answer. In the step where you say *Since these are finite sums, we can switch the order of summation to get $=\frac{1}{(k-m)!}\sum_{j=0}^{k-m}\left[ \binom{k-m}{j}k^{k-m-j}(-1)^n\sum_{n=0}^{k}\binom{k}{n}n^j(-1)^{j}\right]$*, you raise $(-1)$ to the power of $n$ outside of the summation using $n$ as the iterating variable. Is this valid? – TDJSB Aug 08 '21 at 15:09
  • @TDJSB Good catch, looks like I accidentally switched the $j$ and $n$ variables in that sum (the ones that $-1$ is raised to both inside and outside). Fixed now – QC_QAOA Aug 09 '21 at 17:13