I have the equation
$$\frac{b}{x}+\frac{ae^x}{1-e^x}=0$$
How do I prove this equation has no closed-form solution for $x$?
Edit: please note $a,b>0$
I have the equation
$$\frac{b}{x}+\frac{ae^x}{1-e^x}=0$$
How do I prove this equation has no closed-form solution for $x$?
Edit: please note $a,b>0$
I suppose that you mean no closed-form solution in terms of elementary functions.
Let $b=k a$ which makes the equation to be $$k+(x-k)e^x=0$$ Now, let $x=k+y$ to make $$y e^{k+y}+k=0 \implies y e^y=-ke^{-k}$$ and the solution is $$y=W_{-1}\left(-ke^{-k} \right)$$ where appears the lower branch of Lambert function. In the real domain, this function is defined for $0 < k \leq 1$.
Back to $(x,a,b)$ this gives $$x=\frac{b}{a}+W_{-1}\left(-\frac{b }{a}e^{-\frac{b}{a}}\right)$$
My answer is for solutions in terms of elementary functions.
$$\frac{b}{x}+\frac{ae^x}{1-e^x}=0$$ $$axe^x-be^x+b=0\tag{1}$$
The left-hand side of equation (1) is an expression of both $x$ and $e^x$, algebraic over $\mathbb{C}$. It can be shown that such expressions don't have elementary inverses:
How can we show that $A(z,e^z)$ and $A(\ln (z),z)$ have no elementary inverse?
For $a,b\in\overline{\mathbb{Q}}$, equation (1) is an algebraic equation of both $x$ and $e^x$. Lin (1983) proved, assuming Schanuel's conjecture ist true, that such equations, if irreducible, don't have solutions in the elementary numbers.