I'm reading the paper by Dijkstra and van Mill called Topological equivalence of discontinuous norms, and in its introduction there is this:
Consider the case of $\ell^p$ and $\ell^q$, where $p<q$. Then as vector spaces, $\ell^p$ and $\ell^q$ are isomorphic (they have Hamel basis of the same cardinality) and so under this equivalence the norm on $\ell^q$ defines a norm on $\ell^p$, which is badly discontinuous of course.
Now, i get how the norm is constructed, by I absolutely don't understand, why it is "badly discontinuous of course". I tried driving the continuousnes to contradiction by applying Pitt's compactness theorem on the isomorphism and then using the compactnes on sequence of vectors with one coordinate being 1 (changing places) and the others being 0, but I can't get to prove boundedness of the isomorphism (taken as going from $\ell^q$ to $\ell^p$, I can prove boundedness in the other direction quite easily, considering continuity of the norm we want to contradict).
What can I do?