0

We say that two sets $A$ and $B$ are comparables if and only if $|A|\leq |B|$ or $|B|\leq |A|$.

I want prove that this criterio is equivalent to axiom of choice. If I use Zorn lemma it is simple prove that A-C implies that criterio but I don’t know how to prove that that criterio implies A-C. Some ideas?

Federico Fallucca
  • 8,593
  • 1
  • 9
  • 20

2 Answers2

3

HINT:

  • First, show that if $A$ is a set, $\alpha$ is an ordinal, and there is an injection from $A$ to $\alpha$, then $A$ can be well-ordered.

  • Now fix a set $A$. Note that comparability means that for every ordinal $\alpha$, either $\alpha$ injects into $A$ or $A$ injects into $\alpha$. Is it possible that every ordinal injects into $A$?

  • Do you see how to get a principle you already know is equivalent to the axiom of choice from the two bulletpoints above? (What does well-orderability have to do with choice?)

Noah Schweber
  • 245,398
2

Let $\aleph(X)$ denote the Hartogs number of $X$, then we have $\aleph(X)\not\leq |X|$, but since by assumption we have that every two cardinals are comparable we obtain $|X|<\aleph(X)$.

But this now implies that $|X|$ can be well-ordered, since $\aleph(X)$ is always well-orderable, so $X$ can be well-ordered, and since $X$ was arbitrary we conclude that the well ordering principle, which is equivalent to choice, holds.